<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Frantisek Apfelbeck <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org" target="_blank">email@example.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div style="font-size:10pt;font-family:HelveticaNeue,Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,Lucida Grande,sans-serif"><div class="im">
<div>A. "As a result of our prior conversation, we collectively propose: If a
member has not identified themself as such by adding the
Category:Members to their wiki user page by $DATE, they shall no longer
be a member of Noisebridge."
</div></div><div><br>>>> This is extremely radical step, I really wonder what is the threat of unidentified members (on hiatus or active) to the Noisebridge community. Why the people should be identified, why the deadlines? Explain please. It would be very reasonable to get at least in touch with the members letting them know that the things are changing, but I do not see this written anywhere.<br>
</div></div></div></blockquote><div>lol, it's a coup. the gentrification of the mission metastasizing the bridge itself, and anyone who speaks up without a so-called solution (the oft-cited solution "just stop" is summarily dismissed) is branded "negative" and never listened to again. it's sharp, even if unintentional. there goes years of accumulated tools, books, knowledge, community goodwill etc. into the hands of dudes who just got here. gonna let it keep happening?<br>