[Rack] I humbly request the creation of a new "Consensus" mailing list.

[Patrick Keys]

In retrospect, I actually agree with Rubin.  I went through this same 
discussion awhile back when I wanted to have Noisebridge money 
discussion on its own list.

Rubin very succinctly makes a point that consensus involves everybody. 
If we want more people to discuss the concept of consensus as it 
pertains to Noisebridge, such discussion should remain on the discuss list.

Also, as we discussed at the meeting tonight, consensus involves 
EVERYBODY that visits Noisebridge, not just members.


Patrick


On 2/11/2011 11:47 PM, Rubin Abdi wrote:
> Jared Dunne wrote, On 20110212 003823:
>> List description: The goal of this list is to foster in-depth discussion on
>> Consensus in general and as it applies to Noisebridge.  In addition to
>> topical discussions, it should facilitate the logistics of organizing
>> meetings in the space for discussing and improving the Noisebridge Consensus
>> process.
>
> Consensus involves all members of Noisebridge, why segregate chatter on
> that from the discussion list?
>