[Rack] I humbly request the creation of a new "Consensus" mailing list.

[Jared Dunne]

Fair enough.  We can keep those conversations on the main discuss list
unless it seems to be creating a problem of too much noise for uninterested
nb-discuss subscribers.

Request withdrawn.

A question though, then what is the logic for having a separate 'build'
lists?  Building out the space surely affects all of the NB community, but
there is a list for those interested specifically for that topic.  Similar
note could be made for this 'rack' list.  What is the litmus test for when a
new list should be created?

jared-

On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 11:22 AM, jim <jim at well.com> wrote:

>
>    i agree with rubin; a separate list for this
> global topic strikes me as a poor idea. if the
> topic strikes fire, it won't be the first time
> for the list, and who knows who or what will
> come out of the woodwork?
>
>
> On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 01:47 -0600, Rubin Abdi wrote:
> > Jared Dunne wrote, On 20110212 003823:
> > > List description: The goal of this list is to foster in-depth
> discussion on
> > > Consensus in general and as it applies to Noisebridge.  In addition to
> > > topical discussions, it should facilitate the logistics of organizing
> > > meetings in the space for discussing and improving the Noisebridge
> Consensus
> > > process.
> >
> > Consensus involves all members of Noisebridge, why segregate chatter on
> > that from the discussion list?
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/rack/attachments/20110212/48b57c33/attachment.html>