[Rack] Monkeybrains link: using and billing

Bruce Wolfe brucewolfe.sf at gmail.com
Thu May 5 21:18:57 UTC 2011

Understood. I like bonding because it acts like double the amplitude but
really is just providing more threads available at the same speed so QoS or
load balancing is not enforced that often.

The problem with this is when you have connections from two different
sources, if the speeds change too drastically from one to the other, the
users notice it.


On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Jonathan Lassoff <jof at thejof.com> wrote:

> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Bruce Wolfe <brucewolfe.sf at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Why don't you get a bonding router that has multiple WAN ports? I do that
> at
> > my job for failover on DSL when my wireless connection goes down.
> We already do something functionally similar with two separate OpenBSD
> routers that detect when they can no longer reach the Internet and
> failover.
> What we don't do however, is balance NATed connections out of both
> transit links simultaneously.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/rack/attachments/20110505/3fd1263a/attachment.html>

More information about the Rack mailing list