[Rack] manual threading?

[Alex Buie]

I don't quite know how mailman does it algorithmically, but the important
headers are In-Reply-To: and References:. I notice you're on gmail... Have
you thought about subscribing to all messages and then just setting up a
filter to autoarchive or automove them to a folder? Then you can still
retrieve and reply to them normally, but they stay out of your way. Seems a
lot easier than the copy/paste dance and is what I do for all my different
MLs (categorized by folder)

-a

PS: Examples:

In-Reply-To: <C59CE722-B528-45A2-80AF-8963613954D3 at xtreme.com>
References: <51F90F17.4090706 at gmail.com>
 <20130731143322.1ACFD24E00EE at mail.monochrom.at>
 <C59CE722-B528-45A2-80AF-8963613954D3 at xtreme.com>




On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Johny Radio <johnyradio at gmail.com> wrote:

>  Hi Rack
>
> For my convenience, I do my list reading on the archive pages. Example:
>
> https://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/2013-July/date.html
>
> When i reply, it's by way of copy-and-paste. Instead of clicking "Reply"
> in my mail client, i just copy the subject line from the archive, expecting
> that by using the same subject line, my message will be attached to the
> same thread.
>
> Peeps are reporting that my message breaks the thread. Meaning, even
> though my subject is the same, my message does not get displayed with the
> thread in their email client. I'm guessing there must be some hidden header
> containing the thread info. Is that correct?
>
> Is there a way I can adhere to threading while not subscribing to all
> emails?
>
> Many thanks,
>
>  Johny Radio
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rack mailing list
> Rack at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/rack
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/rack/attachments/20130731/106d84b3/attachment-0003.html>