[Rack] Ideas for the network rebuild

Jonathan Lassoff jof at thejof.com
Tue Sep 2 06:07:36 UTC 2014


On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Rubin Abdi <rubin at starset.net> wrote:
> So Casey and I have cleaned up the rack quite a bit.
>
> We've taken the current switch that was making horribly dying noises and
> replaced the fan. It currently setup to be a completely stupid dumb
> unmanaged switch. Every port should give you internet.
>
> Bikeshed has been pulled out (for a lot of good reasons) and is current
> sitting on the shelf in the closet. We've setup a 3 interface Ubiquiti
> EdgeRouter Lite, which I've named Biketrailer.
>
> eth0 - Sonic
> eth1 - Monkeybrains
> eth2 - Inside public network
>
> If/when we plug in Sonic the device is setup with load balancing and
> fail over. Casey right now is dicking around with restoring the QoS
> settings from bikeshet

Awesome! Sounds pretty clean.

> The new IP scheme is currently 10.20.0.0 at a subnet of 255.255.254.0
> (note the 254), with a DHCP range running from 10.20.0.101 to
> 10.20.1.254. The reasoning behind this is 172.30.0.0 isn't actually ours
> to use and I've been meaning to correct this since the 83c days.

Actually, 172.30.0.0/22 is totally cool to use. It's reserved for
private use in RFC 1918 (172.16.0.0/12)

Matt P and I picked that space ages ago at 83c to try and hopefully
never conflict with VPN networks people will want to reach.

Depending on the VPN setup, overlapping RFC1918 space can cause some
usability issues.
Imagine you've got 192.168.1.0/24 in your work office, and
192.168.1.0/24 at home. When you ask for 192.168.1.30, it's a bit
ambiguous what to talk to.

> Minotaur has been readdressed to 10.20.0.4 and is currently talking with
> all the APs, the APs now have a DHCP mapped address of .11 and .12.
>
> Naomi: 10.20.0.3 would be fine for Pony if you want to take that. Just
> make sure the subnet is correct.
>
> At some point in the future I'm going to pick up an 8 port beefier
> version of this router but what's currently in there is fine for our
> current uses, maybe in the next month. Once we've switched routers and
> copied over the config, then we'll start work on having a slightly more
> segregated network as per that network diagram...
>
> Infrastructure (like Minotaur, Pony, touch panels) - 10.20.0.0/23
> Public Wired - 10.10.0.0/23
> Public Wifi - 10.30.0.0/23
>
> The internet is unfucked and the bits are flowing!

Could you use some more horrible-to-manage-better-as-unmanaaged (Dell
PowerConnect 2848) 48-port GigE switches?



More information about the Rack mailing list