[Tastebridge] tastebridge donations

algoldor at frantisekapfelbeck.org algoldor at frantisekapfelbeck.org
Wed Jul 6 20:42:23 UTC 2011


Than I think we understand each other. People discuss what they want  
to use the money for (preferably in advance) and after that they do  
it. It can be as simple as saying "OK we will spend $25 for the  
Tuesday member meeting dinner, it will be an "Italian night" we need  
these ingredients ... and we are short on baking paper so + that"  
discussed in advance, agreed, money taken from Tastebridge budget,  
prices after shopping put on the web and everyone happy, right? It is  
more work but it is doable and transparent.

Sincerely,

Frantisek

PS I've just got a chance to go for a local farmer market to  
promote/sell probiotic beverages. I'm starting on Friday and have  
around 36 hours to brew something nice :-))) I guess that granos  
tibicos/water kefir grains are going to safe me :-))) Please wish me  
luck, it is my first business opportunity!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_kefir


Quoting jim <jim at systemateka.com>:

>
>     (just for clarity) i'm very okay with reimbursing, but
> i think it should be done with advance agreement. i don't
> like the idea that someone does whatever they please and
> then reimburses one's self from the jar with no advance
> discussion.
>     how to use the jar money? probably discuss prospective
> purchases with whoever's around, determine that they're
> staples or some such, then go buy.
>     any one cooking project ought to be funded not from
> the jar but from that project's solicitations.
>     i have not figured out for myself the notion that
> whatever's in the jar at the end of a day should be
> transferred to the general NB coffers, seems at odds with
> my notion of jar_money == staples.
>     ONLY MY OPINION, FWIW.
>
>
> On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 11:34 -0700, cynthia lee wrote:
>> Hey, if it is not ok to reimburse someone for cash expenditures
>> (especially if they are also bringing food donations already) then you
>> are going to find that the offerings of tastebridge are going to be
>> much more limited
>> however, I think we all would benefit from more advance notice about
>> what is going to be cooked up, I struggle w the knowledge that food
>> donations and personal energy are not always predictable for everyone
>> who likes cooking at Noisebridge
>> put this info into the stewpot
>>
>> my point in wanting to put yesterdays kitchen cash donations into the
>> main locked Noisebridge collection is that there wasn't a coking
>> project yesterday (to the best of my knowledge) and the donation jar
>> for Noisebridge in the kitchen should have been where the tastebridge
>> jar was (prominantly displayed)    and that all along general
>> donations should have been sent into the general collection   but
>> haven't been (to the best of my knowledge)
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:54 AM, jim <jim at systemateka.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>         +1 ; if anything should decide funds' allocation, it
>>         should be the people who donate the funds.
>>            when i put money in the jar in the cooking area,
>>         i mean it to be used for general support for cooking
>>         and NOT for reimbursement of someone's expenditures.
>>            i like the idea that some of the money in the
>>         jar in the cooking area goes to the general NB
>>         coffer (orange locked box).
>>            anyone taking money should be loud and clear in
>>         advance of doing so and should do so only by getting
>>         money directly from persons (e.g. miloh's recent
>>         solicitation of funds for shelving).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 01:19 -0700, cynthia lee wrote:
>>         > Hi
>>         > Yesterday, Warren and I cooked. We decided to split the
>>         donations $7
>>         > to the main Noisebridge lock box and $9 to be held by Warren
>>         for
>>         > projects. we felt two people (minimum) should be involved in
>>         both
>>         > removing funds from the tastebridge donation jar and
>>         determining their
>>         > purpose .
>>         > Tonight, as best I know, there wasn't a project. There were
>>         several
>>         > dollars in the donation jar. I discussed with someone who I
>>         have
>>         > cooked w before that the money could go into the main
>>         noisebridge lock
>>         > box but when I later went to do this, a third person, who I
>>         have never
>>         > cooked with before, objected and stated that he had worked
>>         hard for
>>         > the right to refuse to let that money go there and he should
>>         be
>>         > allowed to determine the purpose of the funds in that jar.
>>         He claims
>>         > to have been removing the funds all along and has been
>>         keeping an
>>         > accounting. I would like the group to meet with timely
>>         notice (the
>>         > five minutes notice given for a prior meeting isn't right)
>>         and review
>>         > this decision about the accounting. This was not a pleasant
>>         situation.
>>         > I, like others, bring food donations here and spend time
>>         > cleaning/prepping/cooking and I do not believe any funds
>>         collected
>>         > belong to me and I would like, until we decide on a process,
>>         that at
>>         > least some of the funds go to Noisebridge lock box daily.
>>         > Cynthia
>>
>>         > _______________________________________________
>>         > Tastebridge mailing list
>>         > Tastebridge at lists.noisebridge.net
>>         > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/tastebridge
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tastebridge mailing list
> Tastebridge at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/tastebridge
>






More information about the Tastebridge mailing list