[tor] Approaching ISPs
Cooper Quintin
cooperq at eff.org
Mon Jan 23 19:01:22 UTC 2017
Let me reccomend Monkey Brains as an ISP that might be willing to host
an exit node as well.
On 01/23/2017 11:00 AM, mark burdett wrote:
> There are some tor exit nodes running on Hurricane Electric, operated by
> three different people (one of whom works at Naval Research Lab),
> according to https://torstatus.blutmagie.de/
>
> I guess this makes Hurricane less ideal than another ISP with no nodes.
>
> No details at
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/GoodBadISPs
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ISPCorrespondence
> except mention of "cheap he.net <http://he.net> bandwidth" in a note
> about another ISP
>
> --mark B.
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Patrick O'Doherty <p at trickod.com
> <mailto:p at trickod.com>> wrote:
>
> A very quick search across the archive shows few results for HE
> specifically.
>
> The most promising is from 2013 with someone claiming that "My colo
> provider Hurricane Electric understands Tor"
> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2013-March/001956.html
> <https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2013-March/001956.html>
> which doesn't seem to be the case in our situation.
>
> Patrick O'Doherty:
> > This might be an interesting thread to cc the tor-relays list
> about. I'd
> > search for HE in the archives first though.
> >
> > The HE policies in question for others to view
> > * TOS https://he.net/tos.html
> > * AUP https://he.net/aup.html
> >
> > Things like AUP section 2.2 "No customer shall do anything that could
> > get any portion of Hurricane Electric's IP space ... put on
> blacklists"
> > are things we can't possibly comply with given the nature of the Exit.
> >
> > Ben Kochie:
> >> Patrick and I approached HE about running an exit via their
> network. We
> >> were up front and honest.
> >>
> >> They came back with a non-answer reply of "Have you read our terms of
> >> service?"
> >>
> >> Of course we can't promise anything, and given the overly broad
> terms, HE
> >> is not an option.
> >>
> >> How have we approached vendors in the past?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> tor mailing list
> >> tor at lists.noisebridge.net <mailto:tor at lists.noisebridge.net>
> >> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/tor
> <https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/tor>
> >>
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor mailing list
> tor at lists.noisebridge.net <mailto:tor at lists.noisebridge.net>
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/tor
> <https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/tor>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor mailing list
> tor at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/tor
>
More information about the tor
mailing list