[tor] Expanding our capacity in Quadranet

Cooper Quintin cooperq at eff.org
Wed Mar 8 04:30:24 UTC 2017


Yay! Doubling our capacity sounds great to me! Would it be worth meeting
IRL soon to discuss future projects such as more bridges or exits in the
global south?

On 03/03/2017 12:52 PM, Patrick O'Doherty wrote:
> We've reached out to Quadranet about the possibility of adding 3 more
> servers, which would effectively bring Noisetor's exit capacity to
> 2Gbps+ (given that our current single host is pushing 500+Mbps).
> 
> This bump would up our spend to $3,148/month ($787/month x 4) which
> should be sustainable for a while given our cash reserves. I'm working
> with Andy to get our accounting back into shape such that we can keep
> better tabs on our incoming donations.
> 
> Currently I believe our monthly donations are in the region of
> $600-700/month. I'll get better figures on this in the coming days.
> 
> Given that our accounting is not yet fully up to scratch I propose that
> we do the following in order:
> 
> a) immediately double our capacity in Quadranet
> b) rebab our accounting + get an accurate current account status
> c) plan for a fundraising campaign to raise further recurring donations
> d) bump our capacity again on the back of the new recurring donations +
> our cash reserves.
> 
> thoughts?
> 
> p
> 
> 
> Steve Phillips:
>>>
>>> I asked some tor folks further after the meeting if Noisetor adding more
>>> capacity in our current DC would be valuable; they confirmed that it
>>> would be very much so.
>>> ...
>>> I plan on getting better estimates of our current cash on hand but I
>>> believe it's closer to, or over $10k.
>>> ...
>>> I think that if we were to bring up a new Exit or Bridge we'd also have a
>>> strong story to use to raise further recurring donations and awareness
>>
>> ...
>>
>> Would love to hear further input given the financial implications of
>>
>> making this decision however.
>>
>>
>> All that sounds awesome Patrick; thanks for your work on this.  Who do
>> you need to talk to before moving forward on deploying the NoiseTor funds
>> to spin up another exit node or a bridge?
>>
>> If it'd be useful, I'd like to help with this; the world needs moar Tor
>> :-).  And
>> I'd like to leverage everyone's Tor expertise to put together a "best
>> practices"
>> guide to try to remove some of the uncertainty re: *exactly* what steps to
>> go
>> through to run a node very safely and effectiveley, especially legal
>> ambiguity
>> around running an exit node.
>>
>> --Steve
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> tor mailing list
>> tor at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/tor
>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tor mailing list
> tor at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/tor
> 



More information about the tor mailing list