[Noisebridge-board] Investment committee

[Dr. Jesus]

Have you read the relevant section of the bylaws?

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Kelly <hurtstotouchfire at gmail.com> wrote:
> And regarding the investment committee idea, I think it's a
> potentially terrible idea but I would consider it, pending some
> explanation of what that would actually look like within the structure
> of Noisebridge.
>
> -Kelly
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 14:56, Danny O'Brien <danny at spesh.com> wrote:
>> That sounds like an idea.
>>
>> In other news, shouldn't we be shambling toward the
>> nomination/consensus process for the executive officers?
>>
>> Somebody remind me what the process here is: I remember it all ending
>> with a pseudo-random allocation of Jof, but I also vaguely recall
>> nominations being board-initiated.
>>
>> d.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Dr. Jesus <j at hug.gs> wrote:
>>> I don't think the board has actually done this yet:
>>>
>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/wiki/Bylaws#e._Investment_Committee
>>>
>>> There are very few rules regarding handling of Noisebridge property
>>> and a lot of misinformation.  I'd like to fix this.  Why don't you
>>> folks decide who's going to be on the committee and I'll do the
>>> legwork of setting up meetings among the relevant members to come up
>>> with some proposed guidelines to run through the consensus process.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Board mailing list
>>> Board at lists.noisebridge.net
>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/board
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Board mailing list
>> Board at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/board
>>
>