[Fab] Fwd: [Darkroom] any 110 film enthusiasts?

[Snail]

If you want to try for something that's light-tight, you would have to go
for a solid build (a configuration you set when creating the gcode in
replicatorG) and make the case design thick.

I'm not positive it would be 100% light-tight, but that way you would not
have the honeycomb internal pattern & case design thinness that would lead
to cracks.

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Jason Schorr <echohtp at gmail.com> wrote:

> Attempted to get some help working on a project and as you can see from the
> below email it was suggested i speak with you guys.
>
> I appreciate any help you might be able to provide.
>
> Cheers,
> echo
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Rubin Abdi <rubin at starset.net>
> Date: Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [Darkroom] any 110 film enthusiasts?
> To: Jason Schorr <echohtp at gmail.com>
> Cc: darkroom at lists.noisebridge.net
>
>
> Jason Schorr wrote, On 2011-10-25 16:45:
> > Not sure what more details are needed, 110 film existed in a
> > special cartridge.  The film has been discontinued however the only
> concern
> > is the casing and the size of the film.  I have a few rolls of film, and
> a
> > caliper and want to cad it makerbot it and make it reloadable so that its
> > not a one shot deal.
>
> Oh, for some reason I thought I read 120. Silly me.
>
> So Makerbots suck at printing things that are light tight, though I'm
> sure you know this. You might want to poke the fabrication list too.
>
> --
> Rubin
> rubin at starset.net
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fab mailing list
> Fab at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/fab
>
>


-- 
-Snailssnailssnailssnailssnailssnailssnails
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/fab/attachments/20111025/6ecf8f5b/attachment.html>