[Neuro] tDCS at Noisebridge?

[Anthony Di Franco]

I can appreciate both the idea that phrenology doesn't work and the idea
that there is some amount of statistical consistency across populations in
roughly what brain regions do what and how people respond to stimulation of
various kinds in various regions.
Where would you say the distinction relevant to playing with tdcs is, if
you can? (So this can be part of the documentation being assembled, I hope.)
On Apr 17, 2013 3:04 PM, "Kelly" <hurtstotouchfire at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'd just like to remind everyone that phrenology doesn't work, regardless
> of what you put in your table. But a list of some basic regions with
> citations would be an awesome start. It's probably worth making roughly
> tabular even if some line items are wildly less dependable than others
> because there are probably a few parameters that you care about for each
> region.
>
> K
> On Apr 17, 2013 4:33 PM, "John Withers" <jwithers at reddagger.org> wrote:
>
>> On 04/17/2013 01:10 PM, Anthony Di Franco wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> A section on some hackerspace's wiki summarizing where to put what kind
>>> of stimulation to accomplish what would be ideal.
>>>
>>>
>> Yeah, I am actually working on that. It's part of a larger project and
>> going to take me another few days to complete. But when I am done I will
>> make sure there are links to it on the noisebridge wiki as well that of a
>> couple of other spaces.
>>
>> j
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Neuro mailing list
>> Neuro at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/**mailman/listinfo/neuro<https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/neuro>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Neuro mailing list
> Neuro at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/neuro
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/neuro/attachments/20130417/76f2e6a3/attachment-0003.html>