[Noisebridge-discuss] More details for the nap pods?
jim
jim at well.com
Tue Dec 2 03:38:27 UTC 2008
seems reasonable. how to get it on the agenda?
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 12:46 -0800, Davidfine wrote:
> It's worth mentioning that NB is not supposed to be a do-ocracy. That's
> what things turn into when there's not enough communication and
> leadership. Decisions are made at meetings based on a consensus process.
> That's supposed to be the processes we use to make this stuff work, so
> bring it up tomorrow. What's one more day?
> --D
>
> Mark Cohen wrote:
> > ted glik
> > First off, I think we had a consensus vote, so putting it up again
> > seems like a waste. As they say, meetings are great ways to
> > procrastinate on work. :)
> >
> > It seems reasonable to me that w/o status updates it is safe to assume
> > that nothing has or will happen with that particular project. So, from
> > my angle, if someone has a better use for that space and is willing to
> > act, they should do what they want.. Desks, lights, etc can always be
> > moved, but as it is now, it gets rather crowded on the main level and
> > it would be nice to have an alternative, quiet place to do some
> > electronics work.
> >
> > This is a do-ocracy, and it is better to ask forgiveness than
> > permission. If people want pods, they should act upon that.. At the
> > very least put yellow tape up cordoning off the area with a note
> > stating where the pods are going to be.
> >
> > Just my .02
> >
> > Mark
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss
mailing list