[Noisebridge-discuss] More details for the nap pods?

[C C]

I agree that decisions are made at meetings but when processes aren't
expedited or there just isn't any progress at all, people are allowed to
exercise their do-ocracy rights.

On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Davidfine <d at vidfine.com> wrote:

> It's worth mentioning that NB is not supposed to be a do-ocracy. That's
> what things turn into when there's not enough communication and leadership.
> Decisions are made at meetings based on a consensus process. That's supposed
> to be the processes we use to make this stuff work, so bring it up tomorrow.
> What's one more day?
> --D
>
> Mark Cohen wrote:
>
>> ted glik
>> First off, I think we had a consensus vote, so putting it up again seems
>> like a waste. As they say, meetings are great ways to procrastinate on work.
>> :)
>>
>> It seems reasonable to me that w/o status updates it is safe to assume
>> that nothing has or will happen with that particular project. So, from my
>> angle, if someone has a better use for that space and is willing to act,
>> they should do what they want.. Desks, lights, etc can always be moved, but
>> as it is now, it gets rather crowded on the main level and it would be nice
>> to have an alternative, quiet place to do some electronics work.
>>
>>  This is a do-ocracy, and it is better to ask forgiveness than permission.
>> If people want pods, they should act upon that.. At the very least put
>> yellow tape up cordoning off the area with a note stating where the pods are
>> going to be.
>>
>> Just my .02
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20081201/ed2f9ff6/attachment-0003.html>