[Noisebridge-discuss] naming

[Noah Balmer]

A draft, yes, but it needs work.
(link<https://www.noisebridge.net/index.php/Bylaws>
)

I think Noisebridge or Noise Bridge, no qualifiers, are good.  We can always
trademark, or just use, all the elaborated versions too, so we can use
Noisebridge Labs, Noisebridge Cooperative, Noisebridge Research, Noisebridge
Insurrection (sounds like a party), or whatever else takes our fancy, while
keeping the official name simple and non-specific

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Al Billings <albill at arcanology.com> wrote:

> Was a draft of the by-laws completed yesterday?
>
> Al
>
>
>
>
> On May 21, 2008, at 6:20 PM, Jacob Appelbaum <jacob at appelbaum.net> wrote:
>
>  David Molnar wrote:
>>
>>> Andy Isaacson wrote:
>>>
>>>  Noise Bridge Labs
>>>> Noise Bridge Cooperative
>>>> Noise Bridge Association
>>>> Noise Bridge Services
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> I think Noise Bridge is good because in good times, we'll be a lab if
>> that is our direction. Or we'll be a Co-op. Or whatever we'll be,
>> noisebridge will mean just those things.
>>
>>  I suggest this: the first person to finish writing a complete draft of
>>> the bylaws on the wiki has the right to nominate names. Now let's see if
>>> that's an inducement. ;)
>>>
>>>
>> We've already done this. Too many players have a stake it in ;-)
>>
>> I suggest we leave it as Noise Bridge or Noisebridge.
>>
>> -Jake
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20080521/c24eea70/attachment-0003.html>