[Noisebridge-discuss] Objections to Airport Express for Airtunes?

[Justin Lynn]

Andy Isaacson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 04:29:26PM -0700, Rubin Abdi wrote:
>   
>> <snip>
>>     
> This doesn't address Seth's concern about the BART announcements.  I
> don't have a good answer except that I'd prefer the BART announcement
> not depend on large fragile systems.  Maybe a separate machine wired to
> a standalone speaker -- can we use the doorbell speaker for this?
>   
I would definitely prefer having a separate system for 'essential'
announcements and such.
> Oh, and the next time somebody says "I object to $TECHNOLOGY_FOO, you
> should use $TECHNOLOGY_BAR instead" they've just signed up to do 50% of
> the work in the project.  Don't block, be productive. :)  And if you
> don't like the result, fix it.  (JSharp and I did just this with the
> Ruckus AP -- he got the config and wiring off the ground and up and
> running, I found some places where I felt a different config would be
> better so I implemented it and documented the result.  Hopefully I
> didn't step on too many toes, and we have a far better system far faster
> than if we'd had a long preimplementation discussion.)
>   
Nope, no toes stepped on at all. In fact, I appreciated it as I would
have had to do it anyway :)

J
> -andy
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>