[Noisebridge-discuss] open frameworks?
daniela Steinsapir
danielast at gmail.com
Mon Sep 22 06:41:38 UTC 2008
well great, thank you. This is very useful to know. I am curious to know
more about both.
D
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Meredith L. Patterson <
mlp at thesmartpolitenerd.com> wrote:
> daniela Steinsapir wrote:
>
>> People were telling me, that openframeworks is the C++ reduction software
>> as processing is to Java.
>>
>
> Processing is based on Java, and its syntax is very similar to Java's. As a
> programming language it's distinct from Java, and if I understand things
> correctly, it requires a Java runtime environment.
>
> OpenFrameworks is a C++ library. Programs written with it are written in
> C++, and are compiled with a C++ compiler such as g++.
>
> I was wondering if they are the same thing or if one is more stronger
>> that the other when there is media/interface projects involve? would memory
>> be an issue here?
>> any thoughts? How can you tell?
>>
>
> C++ typically has a reputation for being more memory-efficient than Java,
> since Java code is run in a virtual machine. That said, modern JVMs are
> pretty well-designed, and if you're not comfortable with doing a lot of your
> own memory management, you may find Processing easier to use than C++.
>
> I've written music software in C++ before, but I also like C++ perhaps more
> than is healthy. :P I haven't used OpenFrameworks or Processing before, so
> unfortunately I can't comment on either of those.
>
> --mlp
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
--
www.danielast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20080921/92c351db/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss
mailing list