Fwd: [Noisebridge-discuss] lease text

jim jim at well.com
Sun Sep 28 17:29:58 UTC 2008


   seems first a matter of group discussion, 
don't you think? 
   rachel already answered the question of 
paul's risk and landlord's understanding. 
   how do people feel about noisebridge 
building a reserve of three months' rent as 
opposed to six month's or even more? are 
there other anticipated costs that a cash 
reserve should cover? 
   as to the timeframe, seems a very quick 
job to update after group understanding is 
determined. 


On Sat, 2008-09-27 at 12:20 -0700, Paul Böhm wrote:
> hi jim,
> 
> great you're taking the time to write such policies - can you give us
> a timeframe within you'll complete the documents?
> 
> cheers
> paul
> 
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 9:01 AM, jim <jim at well.com> wrote:
> >
> >   thank you, thank you for using RTF!
> >
> >   it seems strange that the premise address and
> > description isn't specified. other than that, terms
> > seem okay.
> >   what is Noisebridge from a legal point of view?
> > not a corporation yet, it seems from the wiki and
> > email history. and not a sole proprietorship or
> > other formal organization. it may be that jacob,
> > as signer, is the default holding-the-bag person
> > in case of funding disaster. if so, how to cover
> > him/us better?
> >   wiki (could stand a bit of updating, yes?)
> > shows money policy as spend it all. i think one
> > update would be to specify some kind of holding
> > tank amount to be held for emergencies ("don't
> > spend it all right away").
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 18:09 -0700, Rachel McConnell wrote:
> >> Attached is an RTF of the lease for everyone's review.  We plan to
> >> attach an exhibit (as described in pgh 22) to the effect that the floor
> >> tiles will be fixed by October 1st as promised, and something similar
> >> with regards to the wiring but we haven't had a chance to fully evaluate
> >> that yet.
> >>
> >> Read it over and comment if you have the inclination.  It's a pretty
> >> standard lease, actually simpler than many I've signed in the past.
> >>
> >> Rachel
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> >> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> >> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> 




More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list