[Noisebridge-discuss] streaming video, teleconferencing and more

[Ed Hunsinger]

I would love to see video archives of presentations.  With so much that
happens in SF, it's hard to find the time to make it to everything and it'd
be nice to capture that and view when there is time.
If we let people know that the presentation is being recorded and people are
aware of where the camera is pointed, then I think we can work something
out.  Is there anyone who personally is against this or concerned due to not
wanting to be on video?  How can we best address your concerns but still
capture and share information?

-Ed

On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Christie Dudley <longobord at gmail.com>wrote:

> Broadcasting specific events focusing on the presenter is a good idea.
> Video is a great information sharing tool, I'd like to see it happen,
> assuming we're fully cognizant of all the information we're sharing.
>
> Christie
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 10:28 PM, David Stainton <dstainton415 at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I also think that this is a really cool idea.
>> There isn't really a privacy issue; so long
>> as everyone's notified.
>>
>> This could allow us to easily collaborate on projects with remote hacker
>> spaces,
>> to have classes and work shops taught by remote parties etc...
>>
>> I also feel it would be a useful tool to help us learn difficult
>> topics that people lecture about.
>> For example I think it could be useful to the Noisebridge Machine
>> Learning class if
>> the students could take home a recording of a ML lecture or discussion.
>>
>> ~david
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Ceren Ercen <ceren at magnesium.net> wrote:
>> > I do really think this is quite reasonable.
>> >
>> > If anyone's so terrified that there might be a second lens on the back
>> of
>> > the camera, secretly videoing them as watch the speaker, I'll provide a
>> > burqa. I hope light blue is acceptable.
>> >
>> > Just my two cents. The whole "omg no cameras I'm too
>> > sneakyspecialawesomeillegal to risk being videotaped ever!" thing can
>> get
>> > overblown.
>> >
>> > - Ceren
>> >
>> > Martin Bogomolni wrote:
>> >>
>> >> So, they don't have to have their images captured then.   I know some
>> >> people have idiosycratic issues about being on camera, but how about
>> >> pointing the camera at the person doing the speaking (or persons, like
>> >> 5 minutes of Fame) and broadcasting that?
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>
>
>
>
> --
> I refuse to give up childish things.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20090412/76029687/attachment-0003.html>