[Noisebridge-discuss] Virtualization resources

[Ian]

i'm definitely for being lazy. if people volunteer to setup the servers, i
assume they're doing it because they want to. it may be useful for someone
with power over the nb funds to give options that require money. i think
everyone is under the assumption that if you want something done, you have
to do it yourself.
i would be in favor of noisebridge paying for some infrastructure stuff for
collaboration such as github (or github:fi), presently, and even ec2.

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Josh Myer <josh at joshisanerd.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 04:17:13PM -0700, Rachel McConnell wrote:
> > So just to be clear: you want inexperienced people to set up our
> > infrastructure at NB as a learning experience, but you won't use it
> > unless it's as reliable, restorable, and trivial to use as a dedicated
> > external service?  I am not sure that means what you think it means.
> >
>
> I said that we should play to our strengths, and that maybe this kind
> of infrastructure isn't our strength.  However, I know that people are
> going press on ahead regardless (it sounds cool!!), so I wasn't going
> to say anything.  Unfortunately, I was mentioned specifically in the
> thread, so I had to give the same old "This is why I don't use
> noisebridge mailing lists, don't host in mercurial on pony, didn't set
> up wikimedia calendar, blah blah blah" spiel that I've given before.
> --
> Josh Myer   650.248.3796
>  josh at joshisanerd.com
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20090602/ace04331/attachment-0003.html>