[Noisebridge-discuss] non-excellent couch behavior
Kelly
hurtstotouchfire at gmail.com
Sat Nov 14 01:10:02 UTC 2009
At this point I really don't know if it's a joke or what. There's
been a lot of off-list discussion, and the main bullet points seem to
be these:
- The couch movers assumed that a couch was what the ceiling was built for
- None of the darkroom people were aware of this, including those
working on the ceiling
- People are concerned about the safety of having the couch up
there--maybe we can see some load-bearing calculations?
- Some people feel that there was nothing wrong with the couch movers
behavior, and others feel really hurt by it. There doesn't seem to be
a clear NB protocol for excellence on this matter.
-Kelly
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Jason Dusek <jason.dusek at gmail.com> wrote:
> I was involved in the "couch tipping" last night. I helped you
> guys pull it down and later a bunch of people, rowdy-drunk,
> showed and put it back up while I was taking out the trash. I
> handed them the cushions.
>
> It was only after the couch was up there that I had a chance
> to talk with the couch-restorers about their motivations and
> they seemed basically about retribution for some perceived
> slight. I'm sorry about my role in it all. It's clear from
> your email that this is just a huge hassle for the dark room
> team. I wish I had known.
>
> Those of you who put the couch up with me late last night: how
> much did you know when you did it? At the time it seemed like
> a joke but it's been very not funny for some people.
>
> --
> Jason Dusek
>
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss
mailing list