[Noisebridge-discuss] non-excellent couch behavior

Michael Shiloh michaelshiloh1010 at gmail.com
Sat Nov 14 04:22:51 UTC 2009


it's not a matter of primacy. the act of undoing suggests that not 
everyone agrees with the doing, and therefore some discussion should occur.

perhaps those wishing to undo the done should initiate the discussion?

Rich Gibson wrote:
> I am confused.  Why should people who want to undo have primacy?
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Nov 13, 2009, at 7:13 PM, Kelly <hurtstotouchfire at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Heh, I can't condone adding another RULE, but I do think that it's a
>> good description of excellence.  So we have:
>>
>> A) It is excellent to DO things
>> B) If your doing is undone, it is excellent to then seek the dreaded
>> trial of Talking To Other People.
>>
>> Can we handle that, nerds?
>>
>> -K
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Sai Emrys <noisebridge at saizai.com>  
>> wrote:
>>> From an offlist conversation, since it seems of  general relevance:
>>>
>>> I think it might be pointful to have a "1 revert rule" policy.  
>>> Someone
>>> can do X, someone else can undo it, the first someone shouldn't redo
>>> it without consultation.
>>>
>>> This would help ensure that if people have a disagreement over what
>>> should be done, it's solved by discussion rather than attrition.
>>>
>>> - Sai
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> 



More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list