[Noisebridge-discuss] Pony & membership

jim jim at well.com
Mon Sep 7 23:52:05 UTC 2009



   in my experience, blocking was mostly a means 
to continue the conversation until issues were 
negotiated satisfactorily. occasionally someone 
blocked just to cause trouble (and get attention), 
but not often (project one, mid-1970s). 



On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 14:23 -0700, Sai Emrys wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 2:04 PM, John Magolske<listmail at b79.net> wrote:
> > I like Mitch's take that consensus is not so much about blocking,
> > but more about dialog and conversation between holders of differing
> > opinions regarding how things should be done so that we don't *need*
> > to block. Blocking is a last resort.
> 
> I do too. I don't mean this to be any comment on the consensus
> process, how to (not) use blocking, etc - just talking about what
> membership privileges are(n't).
> 
> - Sai
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> 




More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list