[Noisebridge-discuss] Noisebridge Lending Library?
jim
jim at well.com
Wed Feb 10 00:36:31 UTC 2010
i like the idea of stickers, but what the hey.
the books (and other dead tree stuff) should have
markings that reflect their classifications:
cannot take from premises,
can take from premises but must be returned,
can take and keep or burn or eat or....
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 14:58 -0800, Rachel McConnell wrote:
> A sticker or stamp serves a different purpose than a checkout system.
> There is no reason I can think of not to have a stamp like:
>
> Ex Libris Noisebridge
> If found, please return to
> 2169 Mission, 3rd floor
> San Francisco, CA, USA
>
> also with the logo & URL of course. A checkout/reminder system is
> separate and I personally have no opinion on that.
>
> Will anyone actually object if I order a stamp as I have described above?
>
> Rachel
>
>
> Brian Molnar wrote:
> > Definitely in favor of the electronic approach. Stickers/stamps are
> > nice, but the computerized approach certainly has more hack value to it.
> > Plus, if the entire book inventory is kept in a DB then we could even
> > make that data available on the website/wiki, in case people would like
> > search for a particular book.
> >
> > - Brian
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Martin Bogomolni <martinbogo at gmail.com
> > <mailto:martinbogo at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > I know it might sound a bit silly but ...
> >
> > All books have a UPC barcode on them. Barcode scanners like the
> > cueCat are still pretty plentiful and not ridiculously difficult to
> > code for. Perhaps a little checkout computer? Scan all the books
> > into it, and when someone wants to check a book out -- they scan it
> > and leave an email address (nicely anonymous) and they can get a
> > reminder when the book needs to be returned (say 14 days?)
> >
> > Nothing rocket science-y. Python + sqllite/berkeleyDB + cueCat + a
> > couple weekends of work. I certainly can give coding up something a
> > go, since I need something similar for the Austin Hacker Space.
> >
> > -Martin
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Sai Emrys <noisebridge at saizai.com
> > <mailto:noisebridge at saizai.com>> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Albert Sweigart
> > <asweigart at gmail.com <mailto:asweigart at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I think a stamp might be a bit easier to manage than stickers,
> > just as
> > >> an idea. I worry about stickers falling off and leaving sticky goop
> > >> behind.
> > >
> > > The benefit I saw from having it be a sticker is the visibility.
> > Stamps I
> > > think are less visually obvious, and for this it's important for
> > it to be
> > > instantly recognizable. But maybe I just don't know stamps well
> > enough?
> > >
> > > They also have the benefit (if they have good adhesive) of being
> > likely to
> > > adhere to more things than ink does.
> > >
> > > I looked at prices; 1.5" stickers are ~17-25¢ per (depending on
> > volume); 1"
> > > are ~10¢ (ditto). Dunno how much stamps would be.
> > >
> > > My aesthetic ideal would be that it looks something like the CC
> > symbols[0],
> > > but with text. I.e., 2-3 small stickers that clearly show what to
> > do with
> > > the thing.
> > >
> > > Stickers are messier though, it's true. And stamps probably would
> > be cheaper
> > > over time.
> > >
> > > - Sai
> > >
> > > [0] http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > <mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
> > > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > <mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss
mailing list