[Noisebridge-discuss] Urinal

[Ever Falling]

i think if we are to install a urinal it should be in the already to-be
bathroom and keep the laundry room for the machines and as a cleaning
supply/toiletries closet. adding a urinal to the laundry room makes about as
much sense as putting a urinal in the dirty shop if it were possible. i
mean, sure it's another place to pee, but wtf?

i think the current addition of a whole seperate bathroom is more than
enough to cut down on the lines that form at events like 5moF -esp. if
they're unisex- with or without a urinal.

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:29 PM, dpc <weasel at meer.net> wrote:

> Josh Myer <josh at joshisanerd.com> writes:
>
> > Personally, I like the idea of the urinal because it increases our
> > bathroom bandwidth by at least 25%.  This matters when we hold big big
> > events, such as 5MoF, parties, etc.
>
> this is going to come across more doofus-y than i intend.
>
> when josh mentioned 'big events' i was thinking of trough peeing that
> they had/have at stadiums.
>
> pros:
>  - even harder for males w/ poor aim to miss
>  - cool sounds made when hitting the metal trough
>
> cons:
>  - performance anxiety issues
>  - disaster when crossing the beams
>  - might require a stall or change the queuing load on the other wc
>
> \p
> ---
> Kludge: an ill-assorted collection of poorly-matching parts, forming a
> distressing whole. - Jackson Granholm
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>



-- 
Trying to fix or change something, only guarantees and perpetuates its
existence.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20100111/0f949490/attachment-0003.html>