[Noisebridge-discuss] Fwd: Dropped recipients on messages to noisebridge-discuss?

[Kelly]

gah.  meant to re-all that.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kelly <hurtstotouchfire at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] Dropped recipients on messages to
noisebridge-discuss?
To: Vlad Spears <spears at 2secondfuse.com>


I am not having that problem, and I can verify that your cc's are in
fact going through. The messages where I was cc-ed, I received and
could see that I was in the cc.

I view the mailing list entirely through gmail, and have my setings on
the mailing list configured to not send me dupes or my own posts.

-K

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Vlad Spears <spears at 2secondfuse.com> wrote:
> There's something odd going on with my emails to noisebridge-discuss.
>
> I'm noticing dropped recipients.  For instance, the email below I sent
> to noisebridge-discuss, with these addresses on the cc line:
>
> jof at thejof.com
> hurtstotouchfire at gmail.com
> aestetix at gmail.com
> mct at toren.net
> jacob at appelbaum.net
>
> The message in my sent mails still shows the above addresses, but the
> only addresses showing in the email once it hits discuss belong to
> Michael and Aestetix.
>
> Is anyone else having this problem?
>
> Vlad
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 11, 2010, at 3:17 PM, Vlad Spears wrote:
>
>> This could be the result of a poor randomization implementation,
>> though, with a centre dip.
>>
>> It will be interesting to see what happens with more logos in the
>> pool.
>>
>> Vlad
>>
>>
>> It will be interesting to see the results
>>
>>
>> On Jan 11, 2010, at 3:02 PM, Michael C. Toren wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 01:36:20PM -0800, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
>>>> I didn't want to hammer the server any harder, so it's hard to say
>>>> if
>>>> only 2000 tightly-spaced samples are statistically significant, but
>>>> I'll
>>>> let you draw your own conclusions:
>>>
>>> I ran a similar experiment on the 9th, using a silly bash+curl+awk
>>> one-liner that requested the root document 1000 times, randomly
>>> sleeping
>>> between 1 and 3 seconds between each request in order to be kind to
>>> the
>>> server.  The results from that experiment were:
>>>
>>> - 508/1000 requests (50.8%):  wunderground-noisebridge.png
>>> - 335/1000 requests (33.5%):  NB-logo-red-black-med.png
>>> - 157/1000 requests (15.7%):  Pissingponynb-131.png
>>>
>>> It does appear to be heavily weighted.
>>>
>>> -mct
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>