[Noisebridge-discuss] Science for Juggalos

[Corey McGuire]

Both ICP and Keats are making the assumption that one cannot be amazed and
wowed if a purely analytical perspective of the universe is taken.  Instead,
we are freed from superstition and allowed to turn our wondering eyes to
newer and deeper mysteries.

My present fascination is the mind of a child, and the depths, there in, are
galactic in scale compared to the mysteries of gnome filled mines.  And
these are depths that have been explored by every (well, most...ok, maybe
just a few) parent since the first creature with a brain evolved enough to
wonder reflected upon her child.

Wear body armor

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Jonathan Foote <jtfoote at ieee.org> wrote:

> Keats still said it better:
>
> ...Do not all charms fly
> At the mere touch of cold philosophy?
> There was an awful rainbow once in heaven:
> We know her woof, her texture; she is given
> In the dull catalogue of common things.
> Philosophy will clip an Angel’s wings,
> Conquer all mysteries by rule and line,
> Empty the haunted air, and gnomed mine—
> Unweave a rainbow, as it erewhile made
> The tender-person’d Lamia melt into a shade.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20100603/232007b1/attachment-0003.html>