[Noisebridge-discuss] Noisebridge Executive Director

[jim]

   as best i can tell, christie has not responded 
to requests for explanation of her objection to 
those who weren't there and she has not responded 
to specific points expressed to meet her objection. 
   please do so, christie; it would help the 
discussion a lot; as it is, it seems one-sided 
(your remark that we're going in circles is right 
partly because you're not responding to the points). 



On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 18:34 -0800, Jeff Tchang wrote:
> I don't seem to understand why this position is causing so much grief?
> 
> I thought the generally process is that someone stands up and says
> they want to be ED. Then they campaign as to what they can do above
> and beyond the normal duties of the ED position as stated. Any
> objections get voiced and the candidate makes a public response.
> 
> It seems to me the people that should be doing the most talking should
> be the people wanting to be ED?
> 
> -Jeff
> 
> 
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Christie Dudley <longobord at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I guess what I'm trying to say is we're spinning around in circles and
> > nothing is getting resolved.
> > Correct me if I'm wrong on this:
> > - Everyone but me is totally happy with Mitch.
> > - People don't want to think about anyone else, despite my reservations
> > about Mitch.
> > Is there anything I'm missing?
> > Christie
> > _______
> > "We also briefly discussed having officers replaced by very small shell
> > scripts." -- Noisebridge meeting notes 2008-06-17
> >
> > The outer bounds is only the beginning.
> > http://www.flickr.com/photos/genriel/sets/72157623376093724/
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Andy Isaacson <adi at hexapodia.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:51:05AM -0800, Christie Dudley wrote:
> >> > There's no reason not to just renominate Mitch...  but no one has even
> >> > tried to change my mind, other than by telling me flat out I'm wrong.
> >>
> >> I'm really confused, maybe I just can't parse multiple negatives.  If
> >> you want Mitch to be ED ("there's no reason not to renominate Mitch")
> >> then why do we need to change your mind?
> >>
> >> I'm sorry I wasn't at the meeting, but I haven't seen any statement of
> >> what your objections were.  I wasn't even aware that there were any
> >> objections until this thread started.  Could you explain any of your
> >> objections for the benefit of those of us who missed the discussion?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -andy
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>