[Noisebridge-discuss] call for action - Mr. Salvador/Salvator Dalajlama is back

[Sean Cusack]

So, can we reinforce with him that he's not welcome and maybe serve him up
an ultimatum? Something like, "hey, you know you aren't welcome here -
you've been told before. Its not a crash pad, or a place that things can be
taken from. So, please take off. If you can't stop coming back, we'll have
no choice but to call the cops".

I kinda think the sign on a door is a little freaky...mostly because we're
supposed to be a place about welcoming anyone. So, if a new person comes by
the space and sees a big sign that says "this person isn't welcome", I think
it kind of gives off a weird, passive aggressive vibe.

Anyhow - just my $0.02 -
Sean

On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Jesse Zbikowski <
embeddedlinuxguy at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Frantisek, I will be down in the next couple hours if I can assist
> in any "direct action". My 2nd level Ranger can dispell d4 hippies
> twice per day...
>
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Frantisek Apfelbeck
> <algoldor at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > My apologies to Meredith for doubting her statement about Mr. Salvador
> > Dalajlama's recent visits, sorry.
> >
> > The gentlemen in question is now here sleeping on the next couch (10:00
> am,
> > Saturday 30/11/2010). I believe that says enough about his respect to
> this
> > community decisions.
> >
> >
> > My questions are, does anyone knows how he got in? Does he got a key? I
> doubt
> > that he opens the doors by mobile, right?
> >
> >
> > My suggestion - Shall we place his photo above the door and state "not
> welcomed
> > 2010/2011" or something else like that?
> >
> >
> > He is now up and I have told him that he is close to being removed by
> police and
> > he said that he knows that. Well Jaison come to check the things out and
> we have
> > had a chat about that but that is quite all what I've to say right now. I
> still
> > think that we should be able to sort this as a community but I've to
> acknowledge
> > that I'm a bit short on "revelations".
> >
> > There was quite a plenty of discussion on the topic, now I feel that the
> > directed discussion on taking action against people who willingly abolish
> > results of consensus process should be made and focus on this particular
> case,
> > rather in a swift way.
> >
> > Talk to you soon,
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > Frantisek
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20101030/2f34fe44/attachment-0003.html>