[Noisebridge-discuss] call for action - Mr. Salvador/Salvator Dalajlama is back

Christie Dudley longobord at gmail.com
Sat Oct 30 21:57:26 UTC 2010


There's been a discussion of getting a maglock in place since we moved into
the building.  It'd make things easier for everyone, I think.  I can't
remember the exact reason that project was dropped.  I think it had
something to do with the cost of the system and Noisebridge not being able
to come up with a consensus to shell out or the landlords not being OK with
it or there not being power in the area to run the thing. I think all of
those were discussed at some point.

HOWEVER I'd be willing to bet that this guy is NOT getting in via any QR
code, rotating or non-rotating keys, or any other sorts of technical
trickery, but rather he's either coming in when people are leaving or he has
his own physical key.  I'd put money on him waiting outside so he can enter
as others are leaving.  That's a pretty common trick amongst the homeless.

Christie
_______
But wait... there's no FCC on the moon!


On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Carl Sue <theabcasian at gmail.com> wrote:

> On the note of security hacker dojo has an rf I'd key and maglock system
> could this be something we can get in place, I know there has been
> controversy over it but perhaps now would be a good time to start talking
> about it, what about keeping the current buzz in but add the maglock and
> remove the key it would also give us a notice that the door is open and
> needs to be shut. on that note im guessing leaving the door open even for
> workshops is bad maybe we can get rid of the type that people use to hold
> the door open?
> On Oct 30, 2010 2:06 PM, "meredith scheff" <satiredun at gmail.com> wrote:
> > If everyone on this thread tells him he's not welcome, that's a whole
> hell
> > of a lot of mojo in this guy's face.
> >
> > I, as much as I really don't like this guy, also detest the calling
> police
> > option. HOWEVER: *threatening* to call the police is just fine. I also
> don't
> > like the sign idea, it's passive aggressive, and who knows what this
> guy's
> > faculties for recognizing his own face.
> > Direct confrontation. Calm, direct, keep the message clear and simple.
> >
> > As for safety policies, I'm all for keeping them a bit higher, but please
> > don't think I mean TSA. I mean, we're in a sketchy hood, and so far we
> have
> > been adrift in a sheltered harbor of anonymity and obscurity, and that is
> > ending or has ended. We need to recognize that. Can we get the rotating
> key
> > back up?
> > I don't think we should *change* the lock, but we could lock the glass
> door
> > at night.
> > These items i believe are for the next meeting. I can't make this tuesday
> > because of prior obligations, but would love to be a part of the
> discussions
> > the meeting afterwords.
> >
> > Also, here's an idea: for membership applications, have there be a 1 week
> > period between the end of the application and the initiation. Post that
> > person's name on the list or the wiki (or their moniker, or whatever) so
> > that folks who can't make the meeting can weigh in, as well.
> > I realize that doesn't actually help with the problem of random weirdos
> > (more weird and random than the normal) but it's an idea.
> >
> > Keep calm and carry on
> > Meredith
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Jonathan Lassoff <jof at thejof.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Sean Cusack <sean.p.cusack at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > So, can we reinforce with him that he's not welcome and maybe serve
> him
> >> up
> >> > an ultimatum? Something like, "hey, you know you aren't welcome here -
> >> > you've been told before. Its not a crash pad, or a place that things
> can
> >> be
> >> > taken from. So, please take off. If you can't stop coming back, we'll
> >> have
> >> > no choice but to call the cops".
> >>
> >> Personally, I really detest the idea of calling the police to get this
> >> guy to leave.
> >>
> >> If anything, I think this is a good chance for us to unite and look at
> >> our security practices for access control. For a *hacker*space of all
> >> things, I think our "security" at 2169 is pretty dismal (read:
> >> nonexistent).
> >>
> >> A couple of things I think we can start doing:
> >> - Ask on the intercom who is coming in
> >> - Remove a public QR code by the front door
> >> - Make sure the "key" page on pony is properly rotating its keys (it
> >> seems to have stopped)
> >> - Repair / replace the lock on the door from the stairwell and/or
> elevator
> >> gate
> >>
> >> What other things can we do to make sure we're not just letting in
> >> total strangers without greeting them first?
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> >> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> >> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > doing stuff and making things
> > ---
> > "The function of all art ... is an extension of the function of the
> visual
> > brain, to acquire knowledge; ...artists are, in a sense, neurologists who
> > study the capacities of the visual brain with techniques that are unique
> to
> > them. ." -Semir Zeki
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20101030/76b32912/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list