[Noisebridge-discuss] call for action - Mr. Salvador/Salvator Dalajlama is back

[Carl Sue]

My vote for a passive security system is to discourage Dalvador Dali Lama
v.2 from emptying the place and taking it to the pawn shop across the street
for crack money at 3:30 AM when they notice nobody is there to stop them. My
concern is that our unwanteds problem has only really been increasing never
decreasing and the infractions have been getting slowly worse. I personally
will welcome a slightly elevated screening process and better Locks as an
alternative to not having anything. I don¹t see how having a more active
lock system, and maybe putting a webcam at the buzzer for seeing who is at
the door is creating rules. The way I see it is noisebridge encourages
maturity and a mature crowd and some people will just not have the maturity
to respect the space call me an elitist but some people do not have that
maturity and any efforts to keep them out shouldn't be looked at as hurting
our image only enhancing it for the good of getting projects done.


Carl Sue
Carl at carlsue.com

"Why join the navy if you can be a pirate"?
-Steve Jobs

From:  <girlgeek at wt.net>
Date:  Sat, 30 Oct 2010 18:17:52 -0700
To:  Jonathan Lassoff <jof at thejof.com>
Cc:  <noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>, <adi at hexapodia.org>
Subject:  Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] call for action - Mr. Salvador/Salvator
Dalajlama is back

Just to add my 2 cents.

Mr. Salvador Dalai Lama will get in what ever security system we put in
place, and security systems are a pain, and  many expensive.  Unfortunate
souls are a problem that will recur from time to time.  But I vote for
chasing the problem individuals  out rather than changing the way
Noisebridge works.  It takes more personal assertiveness.  To use a
political more or less parallel - my recommendation is to go more in the
direction of chasing down Bin Laden, and less in the direction of going to
war with 2 countries because of him.  If a whole bunch of Salvador
equivalents start showing up with regularity, then I change my mind.  As
long as it is just him - throw him out.  I also am less opposed to calling
the cops than most of the rest of Noisebridge is.

As I say, my 2 cents.

- Claudia


--- jof at thejof.com wrote:

From: Jonathan Lassoff <jof at thejof.com>
To: Andy Isaacson <adi at hexapodia.org>
Cc: noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] call for action - Mr. Salvador/Salvator
Dalajlama is back
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 16:35:17 -0700


A "hasp"! That's the word I was looking for.
Something that latches it shut so it can't be opened from the outside is all
I was thinking.

Cheers,
jof

> On Oct 30, 2010 4:21 PM, "Andy Isaacson" <adi at hexapodia.org> wrote:
> 

On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 02:08:27PM -0700, meredith scheff wrote:
> Keep the patio door locked. As fo...
The roof hatch already has two hasps for locks.  It'd be super annoying
to have a real padlock there, but a couple of carabiners should do the
trick.

-andy

_______________________________________________
Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
Noisebridge-discuss...

_______________________________________________ Noisebridge-discuss mailing
list Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
</eonapps/ft/wm/page/compose?send_to=Noisebridge-discuss%40lists.noisebridge
.net> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
_______________________________________________ Noisebridge-discuss mailing
list Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20101030/72ebebe9/attachment-0003.html>