[Noisebridge-discuss] Safety

[Matt Joyce]

Actually bowels bacteria are usually fairly unique.

It would be a pretty acceptable metric by which to authenticate someone.

On Sep 20, 2010 1:12 PM, "Michael Shiloh" <michaelshiloh1010 at gmail.com>
wrote:
> As a form of ID? I didn't realize the technology was there yet.
>
> Live and learn...
>
> On 09/20/2010 01:06 PM, Matt Joyce wrote:
>> No mention of anal probes... just thought I'd raise that as an option.
>>
>> On Sep 20, 2010 12:56 PM, "Jack Perkins" <jackaperkins at gmail.com
>> <mailto:jackaperkins at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > Nothing says inviting, free and open like security cameras, RFID and
>> > compulsory interviews upon entry!
>> >
>> >> funny things happen to cameras at Noisebridge.
>> > :3
>> >
>> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Thomas Stowe
>> <stowe.thomas at gmail.com <mailto:stowe.thomas at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >> From an outsider (me), I'd say that any person you didn't recognize
>> would be
>> >> "new" and if they stated that they didn't need help, either they'd
>> be lying
>> >> or a member. You could always ask their name as they come in if you
>> didn't
>> >> recognize them on the camera and check a registry. A sign-in sheet
might
>> >> work for this, though some people hate those. A mandatory RFID badge
>> to get
>> >> would be more useful and would be possible but harder to automate
>> with long
>> >> range RFID and something interacting with "the buzzer".
>> >> One or two small "wireless" 2.4ghz cameras can be purchased for
>> under $120.
>> >> It might become expensive with non-rechargeable batteries if you
>> don't have
>> >> somewhere you can plug the camera into if you opt to power such a
>> system via
>> >> 9 Volt batteries. I've seen IP cameras that are powered via Power Over
>> >> Ethernet and I know firsthand that a POE camera is an easy solution to
>> >> implement, though such a camera might cost $150 to $300 (the last time
I
>> >> checked). With a POE IP camera if an ethernet will reach, it will
>> power the
>> >> camera and receive data accessible on the local network that can
>> also be put
>> >> on the Internet. I know that the company I have web hosting with
>> >> (http://ovh.ie) offers free software that acts to upload to free (in
>> beta)
>> >> storage for still images with one week's cache and this is what I use
to
>> >> capture images from my home camera setup (just a webcam so far).
>> >> Here's their pitch:
>> >> Discover video surveillance via the Internet, with recordings
accessible
>> >> from any connected PC.
>> >>
>> >> Compatible with a simple webcam;
>> >> Recordings available for download;
>> >> View videos from an internet browser...
>> >>
>> >> Here's their offer:
>> >> http://www.ovh.ie/products/video_surveillance_offers.xml
>> >> I think off-site storage makes more sense because if your images and
>> videos
>> >> are stolen with any server you're out of luck.
>> >> I also have SMEServer running an ftp user in proxmox on my server
>> that does
>> >> the same thing via script-automated ftp jobs.
>> >> I'll eventually use a second machine to do this with larger storage
>> so I can
>> >> capture / upload video streams but for now it's a working solution
>> that can
>> >> handle images in a more permanent way.
>> >> I'm a firm believer in video surveillance as a security measure and a
>> >> cheapie kit with eight cameras an be obtained for under $800 and
>> includes a
>> >> DVR with a 500 gigabyte hard drive. If anyone's interested in more
>> info (for
>> >> yourself or the Noisebridge site), let me know and I'll share what I
>> can in
>> >> the way of knowledge, bookmark URLs and vendors that sell such
>> equipment.
>> >> Kind Regards,
>> >>
>> >> Thomas C. Stowe
>> >> The information transmitted in this communication is intended only
>> for the
>> >> person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
>> >> and/or privileged information. Any review, retransmission,
>> dissemination,
>> >> copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon,
this
>> >> information, or any part thereof, by persons or entities other than
the
>> >> intended recipient, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
>> >> received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and
>> delete and
>> >> destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all
>> >> attachments.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Leif Ryge <leif at synthesize.us
>> <mailto:leif at synthesize.us>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> On 09/20/2010 10:44 AM, Casey Callendrello wrote:
>> >>> > What if there was a video camera on the gate end? That way you
could
>> >>> > tell if you were buzzing in a new person or not.
>> >>>
>> >>> How could you tell?
>> >>>
>> >>> ~leif
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> >>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> <mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
>> >>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> >> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> <mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
>> >> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>> >>
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> <mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
>> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
> --
> Sent from my ASR-33
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20100920/1dab4d17/attachment-0003.html>