[Noisebridge-discuss] Safety
Michael Shiloh
michaelshiloh1010 at gmail.com
Mon Sep 20 20:24:51 UTC 2010
Imaging ... 3D printer ... Jewelery..
Ok I'm done now
On 09/20/2010 01:18 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> On 9/20/10 1:12 PM, Michael Shiloh wrote:
>> As a form of ID? I didn't realize the technology was there yet.
>
> rest assured that the pattern of polyps in your colon is unique...
>
> joel
>
>> Live and learn...
>>
>> On 09/20/2010 01:06 PM, Matt Joyce wrote:
>>> No mention of anal probes... just thought I'd raise that as an option.
>>>
>>> On Sep 20, 2010 12:56 PM, "Jack Perkins"<jackaperkins at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:jackaperkins at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> > Nothing says inviting, free and open like security cameras, RFID and
>>> > compulsory interviews upon entry!
>>> >
>>> >> funny things happen to cameras at Noisebridge.
>>> > :3
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Thomas Stowe
>>> <stowe.thomas at gmail.com<mailto:stowe.thomas at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> >> From an outsider (me), I'd say that any person you didn't recognize
>>> would be
>>> >> "new" and if they stated that they didn't need help, either they'd
>>> be lying
>>> >> or a member. You could always ask their name as they come in if you
>>> didn't
>>> >> recognize them on the camera and check a registry. A sign-in sheet might
>>> >> work for this, though some people hate those. A mandatory RFID badge
>>> to get
>>> >> would be more useful and would be possible but harder to automate
>>> with long
>>> >> range RFID and something interacting with "the buzzer".
>>> >> One or two small "wireless" 2.4ghz cameras can be purchased for
>>> under $120.
>>> >> It might become expensive with non-rechargeable batteries if you
>>> don't have
>>> >> somewhere you can plug the camera into if you opt to power such a
>>> system via
>>> >> 9 Volt batteries. I've seen IP cameras that are powered via Power Over
>>> >> Ethernet and I know firsthand that a POE camera is an easy solution to
>>> >> implement, though such a camera might cost $150 to $300 (the last time I
>>> >> checked). With a POE IP camera if an ethernet will reach, it will
>>> power the
>>> >> camera and receive data accessible on the local network that can
>>> also be put
>>> >> on the Internet. I know that the company I have web hosting with
>>> >> (http://ovh.ie) offers free software that acts to upload to free (in
>>> beta)
>>> >> storage for still images with one week's cache and this is what I use to
>>> >> capture images from my home camera setup (just a webcam so far).
>>> >> Here's their pitch:
>>> >> Discover video surveillance via the Internet, with recordings accessible
>>> >> from any connected PC.
>>> >>
>>> >> Compatible with a simple webcam;
>>> >> Recordings available for download;
>>> >> View videos from an internet browser...
>>> >>
>>> >> Here's their offer:
>>> >> http://www.ovh.ie/products/video_surveillance_offers.xml
>>> >> I think off-site storage makes more sense because if your images and
>>> videos
>>> >> are stolen with any server you're out of luck.
>>> >> I also have SMEServer running an ftp user in proxmox on my server
>>> that does
>>> >> the same thing via script-automated ftp jobs.
>>> >> I'll eventually use a second machine to do this with larger storage
>>> so I can
>>> >> capture / upload video streams but for now it's a working solution
>>> that can
>>> >> handle images in a more permanent way.
>>> >> I'm a firm believer in video surveillance as a security measure and a
>>> >> cheapie kit with eight cameras an be obtained for under $800 and
>>> includes a
>>> >> DVR with a 500 gigabyte hard drive. If anyone's interested in more
>>> info (for
>>> >> yourself or the Noisebridge site), let me know and I'll share what I
>>> can in
>>> >> the way of knowledge, bookmark URLs and vendors that sell such
>>> equipment.
>>> >> Kind Regards,
>>> >>
>>> >> Thomas C. Stowe
>>> >> The information transmitted in this communication is intended only
>>> for the
>>> >> person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
>>> >> and/or privileged information. Any review, retransmission,
>>> dissemination,
>>> >> copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this
>>> >> information, or any part thereof, by persons or entities other than the
>>> >> intended recipient, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
>>> >> received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and
>>> delete and
>>> >> destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all
>>> >> attachments.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Leif Ryge<leif at synthesize.us
>>> <mailto:leif at synthesize.us>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On 09/20/2010 10:44 AM, Casey Callendrello wrote:
>>> >>> > What if there was a video camera on the gate end? That way you could
>>> >>> > tell if you were buzzing in a new person or not.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> How could you tell?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> ~leif
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>> >>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>>> <mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
>>> >>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>> >> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>>> <mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
>>> >> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>>> <mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
>>> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>
>
>
--
Sent from my ASR-33
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss
mailing list