[Noisebridge-discuss] Safety

[Joel Jaeggli]

On 9/20/10 1:12 PM, Michael Shiloh wrote:
> As a form of ID? I didn't realize the technology was there yet.

rest assured that the pattern of polyps in your colon is unique...

joel

> Live and learn...
> 
> On 09/20/2010 01:06 PM, Matt Joyce wrote:
>> No mention of anal probes... just thought I'd raise that as an option.
>>
>> On Sep 20, 2010 12:56 PM, "Jack Perkins" <jackaperkins at gmail.com
>> <mailto:jackaperkins at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>  > Nothing says inviting, free and open like security cameras, RFID and
>>  > compulsory interviews upon entry!
>>  >
>>  >> funny things happen to cameras at Noisebridge.
>>  > :3
>>  >
>>  > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Thomas Stowe
>> <stowe.thomas at gmail.com <mailto:stowe.thomas at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>  >> From an outsider (me), I'd say that any person you didn't recognize
>> would be
>>  >> "new" and if they stated that they didn't need help, either they'd
>> be lying
>>  >> or a member. You could always ask their name as they come in if you
>> didn't
>>  >> recognize them on the camera and check a registry. A sign-in sheet might
>>  >> work for this, though some people hate those. A mandatory RFID badge
>> to get
>>  >> would be more useful and would be possible but harder to automate
>> with long
>>  >> range RFID and something interacting with "the buzzer".
>>  >> One or two small "wireless" 2.4ghz cameras can be purchased for
>> under $120.
>>  >> It might become expensive with non-rechargeable batteries if you
>> don't have
>>  >> somewhere you can plug the camera into if you opt to power such a
>> system via
>>  >> 9 Volt batteries. I've seen IP cameras that are powered via Power Over
>>  >> Ethernet and I know firsthand that a POE camera is an easy solution to
>>  >> implement, though such a camera might cost $150 to $300 (the last time I
>>  >> checked). With a POE IP camera if an ethernet will reach, it will
>> power the
>>  >> camera and receive data accessible on the local network that can
>> also be put
>>  >> on the Internet. I know that the company I have web hosting with
>>  >> (http://ovh.ie) offers free software that acts to upload to free (in
>> beta)
>>  >> storage for still images with one week's cache and this is what I use to
>>  >> capture images from my home camera setup (just a webcam so far).
>>  >> Here's their pitch:
>>  >> Discover video surveillance via the Internet, with recordings accessible
>>  >> from any connected PC.
>>  >>
>>  >> Compatible with a simple webcam;
>>  >> Recordings available for download;
>>  >> View videos from an internet browser...
>>  >>
>>  >> Here's their offer:
>>  >> http://www.ovh.ie/products/video_surveillance_offers.xml
>>  >> I think off-site storage makes more sense because if your images and
>> videos
>>  >> are stolen with any server you're out of luck.
>>  >> I also have SMEServer running an ftp user in proxmox on my server
>> that does
>>  >> the same thing via script-automated ftp jobs.
>>  >> I'll eventually use a second machine to do this with larger storage
>> so I can
>>  >> capture / upload video streams but for now it's a working solution
>> that can
>>  >> handle images in a more permanent way.
>>  >> I'm a firm believer in video surveillance as a security measure and a
>>  >> cheapie kit with eight cameras an be obtained for under $800 and
>> includes a
>>  >> DVR with a 500 gigabyte hard drive. If anyone's interested in more
>> info (for
>>  >> yourself or the Noisebridge site), let me know and I'll share what I
>> can in
>>  >> the way of knowledge, bookmark URLs and vendors that sell such
>> equipment.
>>  >> Kind Regards,
>>  >>
>>  >> Thomas C. Stowe
>>  >> The information transmitted in this communication is intended only
>> for the
>>  >> person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
>>  >> and/or privileged information. Any review, retransmission,
>> dissemination,
>>  >> copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this
>>  >> information, or any part thereof, by persons or entities other than the
>>  >> intended recipient, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
>>  >> received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and
>> delete and
>>  >> destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all
>>  >> attachments.
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Leif Ryge <leif at synthesize.us
>> <mailto:leif at synthesize.us>> wrote:
>>  >>>
>>  >>> On 09/20/2010 10:44 AM, Casey Callendrello wrote:
>>  >>> > What if there was a video camera on the gate end? That way you could
>>  >>> > tell if you were buzzing in a new person or not.
>>  >>>
>>  >>> How could you tell?
>>  >>>
>>  >>> ~leif
>>  >>> _______________________________________________
>>  >>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>  >>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> <mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
>>  >>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >> _______________________________________________
>>  >> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>  >> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> <mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
>>  >> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  > _______________________________________________
>>  > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>  > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> <mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
>>  > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>