[Noisebridge-discuss] Practical Politics
danny at spesh.com
Thu Feb 3 00:54:09 UTC 2011
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Danny O'Brien <danny at spesh.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:16 PM, rachel lyra hospodar <rachelyra at gmail.com>wrote:
>> Re: jim's observations about talking vs remembering
>> It's hard to know, in our sprawling cultural biome, how to convey
>> information, via sign, wiki, email, talking, etc. So many options! I think
>> that in this case the goal should be for many of us to be well-versed in
>> what Consensus means and how we have agreed to enact it. Ideally there would
>> be someone or several someones at Every Meeting who is well versed in how
>> this works. Some things around the space are kind of institutional
>> knowledge held by one person - you have to track down x person to find out
>> about y thing in z corner. I think that part of fixing the consensus process
>> in our community is creating a shared community knowledge of how the process
>> works - and a shared commitment to trying to make it work. Without that
>> last, there's no reason to try. I think that commitment is part of the duty
>> of membership.
> I totally agree.
> I'm going to be out until the 18th -- if people think there's more to this
> discussion than just one meeting, I'd love to attend the next.
Actually, can someone volunteer to write up what this meeting, so others
can read and learn about it (including, selfishly, me?)
On Feb 2, 2011 9:56 AM, "jim" <jim at systemateka.com> wrote:
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss