[Noisebridge-discuss] Practical Politics

[Danny O'Brien]

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Danny O'Brien <danny at spesh.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:16 PM, rachel lyra hospodar <rachelyra at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Re: jim's observations about talking vs remembering
>>
>> It's hard to know, in our sprawling cultural biome, how to convey
>> information, via sign, wiki, email, talking, etc. So many options! I think
>> that in this case the goal should be for many of us to be well-versed in
>> what Consensus means and how we have agreed to enact it. Ideally there would
>> be someone or several someones at Every Meeting who is well versed in how
>> this works.  Some things around the space are kind of institutional
>> knowledge held by one person - you have to track down x person to find out
>> about y thing in z corner. I think that part of fixing the consensus process
>> in our community is creating a shared community knowledge of how the process
>> works - and a shared commitment to trying to make it work. Without that
>> last, there's no reason to try.  I think that commitment is part of the duty
>> of membership.
>>
>> mediumreality.com
>>
>
> I totally agree.
>
> I'm going to be out until the 18th -- if people think there's more to this
> discussion than just one meeting, I'd love to attend the next.
>


Actually, can someone  volunteer to write up what this meeting, so others
can read and learn about it (including, selfishly, me?)


 On Feb 2, 2011 9:56 AM, "jim" <jim at systemateka.com> wrote:
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20110202/6292254b/attachment-0003.html>