[Noisebridge-discuss] okay, so no lockers. just forget it.

Albert Sweigart asweigart at gmail.com
Thu Feb 17 19:58:09 UTC 2011

For the record, I'm for lockers, on some negotiable conditions:

* They're privately paid for.

* They don't take up "too much" space (and we keep the existing member
shelves, of course).

* They're only available to members in good standing. (I'm for getting
more benefits and incentives for people to become members.)

* We charge $10 a month for their use, to keep them from going stale
like the member shelves tend to. This can be used to partially/fully
pay back the person who paid for them (or not), and then can go to


On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Rachel McConnell <rachel at xtreme.com> wrote:
> Also, for the record, I did not express an opinion for or against.  I
> merely asked for discussion.
> Rachel M
> Moxie Marlinspike wrote:
>> On 02/17/2011 05:19 AM, Patrick Keys wrote:
>>> Here's my tally based on comments on the thread:
>>> unopposed to lockers (6): jim, rachel m., john e, L E, sean, patrick
>>> opposed to lockers (6): rubin, jake, claudia, leif, snail, meredith
>> Hey Patrick, I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to suggest here,
>> but I think you might be missing a key concept if you think that this
>> kind of quantification is at all significant.  Not to mention that it
>> certainly has a tone of the lines being drawn.  Consensus is not the
>> same as unanimous voting, and if you only conceptualize people in
>> categories like "for" or "against," I think you're going to have trouble
>> making group decisions.
>> If this is an attempt to describe the present situation for future
>> reflection, I think it would serve you much more effectively to
>> enumerate the various concerns that people contributed to this
>> discussion, so that in the future someone can come up with a solution
>> that meets everyone's needs.
>> This is not to mention that some number of people likely did not
>> contribute to this thread (myself included), because they saw their
>> concerns/interests adequately covered by comments others had already
>> made, and decided not to repeat them merely for the purpose of seeing
>> ourselves type.
>> - moxie
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss

More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list