[Noisebridge-discuss] Hologlyphic-Movie/Noisbridge grant funding re-application

Walter Funk marybraindoe at yahoo.com
Wed Nov 23 23:01:22 UTC 2011


Yes, I would like to ask for consensus. It's correct I was miss-clear as to when this was to be brought up, at the meeting, I did mean for it to be up for consensus.

Hope it can be a consensus item for next week, and we can discuss it here. In terms of managing the money, I do have a fiscal sponsor, Indy Arts and Media, who have a great track record working with artists and non-profits. Their mission is to help with projects like this.

They took on this project last time, helped with the budget, will help with reporting and other financial work if the funds are granted.

Here is their website:


Basically trying to re-do the same project, so hoping for consensus to try again on the original terms.

If anyone has more questions, please feel free to ask.

In 3D,

 From: Rubin Abdi <rubin at starset.net>
To: Walter Funk <marybraindoe at yahoo.com> 
Cc: "noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net" <noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net> 
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Noisebridge-discuss] Hologlyphic-Movie/Noisbridge grant funding re-application
Hi Walter.

Last night at the meeting you wanted to talk about your project and this
letter of intent to be indorsed by Noisebridge. You were asked to hold
off talking about it till a more appropriate time in the meeting.

It seems as though it wasn't clear to Jim or Shannon or anyone else at
the meeting that you actually wanted to bring this action up as a
discussion item, to be consented on at our next meeting (Nov 29th). If
you remember we spoke about this after the meeting was over, and that
generally through miscommunication we never brought it up formally as a
discussion item. Since you have a due date to work worth, you wanted to
know if there was any way to bring this item up for consensus on the
29th without having it actually getting discussed at the meeting that
just passed.

My advice to you was to bring up this mishap on the discussion list and
see if anyone would object to you pushing for consensus next week by
holding discussion for the item on the mailing list, in addition to the
actually item you want to achieve consensus on. However I don't see text
from your previous email regarding any of that, nor are you even asking
for consensus.

Did I miss something? When we were chatting?

rubin at starset.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20111123/dfba0281/attachment.html>

More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list