[Noisebridge-discuss] Rob 2.0

[miloh]

On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Jake <jake at spaz.org> wrote:

> I just got to noisebridge (sun Oct. 9th 7pm) and Rob was here, working on
> something with Duncan.  I mentioned this to Miloh and Rolf and they said
> they had asked him to leave and he refused.
>
>
Thanks for taking initiative dealing with Noisebridge, pleaes allow me to
correct the facts that concern me:

When we talked yesterday afternoon I never said I asked Rob 2.0 aka dank to
leave that day. I said 'I have asked him to leave' (this happened in
September and you were there), that I saw him sleeping there (on Sunday Oct
9, 2011), and that I refused to talk to him and refused to be police
Noisebridge. I continue to see Rob 2.0 at Noisebridge and I refuse to
interact with him.

Please don't drag Rolf into this, he had negligable interaction with anyone
other than the 20 college students we taught electronics and soldering to.

I saw Rob2.0 aka dank sleeping in the library when I arrived around 1:15pm.
He awoke at 2pm and went to the West desk by the fire escape for an hour,
then moved to the (east-center) electronics bench and disassembled a
laptop.  He was still at Noisebridge when I left at 7pm.


I went to Rob myself and asked him if he had been asked to leave, and he
> said he had not.  I asked him if he would be coming to the tuesday meeting
> and he said "maybe".
>

I told him that he would be discussed at the tuesday meeting and if he did
> not show up, he would almost certainly be banned.  I said that if he
> decided to show up after being banned, it would be a big deal.  He
> immediately became belligerant and i wasn't really able to say anything
> else after that without him talking over me.
>
> He told me that if he came back, it would be to "get [his] stuff back",
> and he said that his shit had been stolen from him and he would get his
> shit back.  I interpret this to mean he intends to steal computers from
> noisebridge until he is satisfied that he has stolen as much as he thinks
> was stolen from him, which he has said is thousands of dollars worth of
> servers.
>
> He also said something about how he would feel bad if he had to "shut this
> place down".  That was clearly made as a threat.
>

>
It was a very unproductive conversation.  but i think it's clear that if
> Rob doesn't show up to the tuesday meeting, it's not because he didn't
> know about it.
>
> -jake
>
>

I've had to clean up after this rob2.0 aka dank guy multiple times, dealt
with unpredictable disruptions from him, and have ended up kicked him out
for making messes and being a nuisance to others. It was stated at that time
in September that he should attempt reconciliation before return, through a
tuesday meeting or nb-discuss. He refuses and continues to haunt
Noisebridge.

-miloh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20111010/8447e860/attachment-0003.html>