[Noisebridge-discuss] Are people okay with people sleeping at the Noisebridge space?

Al Sweigart asweigart at gmail.com
Tue Oct 11 23:50:02 UTC 2011


Yeah, and the problem of "that person is trusted and you arent" is
that it isn't any different from run-of-the-mill favoritism, which
shouldn't be a Noisebridge value.

-Al

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Ryan Rawson <ryanobjc at gmail.com> wrote:
> I would tend to agree with that.  Short of having a "that person is
> trusted and you arent" type of argument, it's better to have a line in
> the sand.
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Rubin Abdi <rubin at starset.net> wrote:
>> Ryan Rawson wrote, On 2011-10-11 15:53:
>>> I think there is a big difference between nap time for busy hackers and
>>> people using noisebridge as a infrastructure for living.
>>
>> Yes, this is true, but the difference is lost when you're arguing with
>> someone who wants to use Noisebridge as their residence. Someone
>> "napping" in the space for a short while provides justification for them
>> to sleep over night and eventually move in.
>>
>> Al: Nice troll thread here by the way.
>>
>> --
>> Rubin
>> rubin at starset.net
>>
>>
>



More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list