[Noisebridge-discuss] Meeting notes 2011-09-13

gnnr gnnrok at gmail.com
Tue Sep 20 01:18:54 UTC 2011


If we are certain of what was taken or damaged and by whom, could we request compensation for the
amount it cost the space.  I don't think the community should have to bare the cost of destructive acts.

Gavin
On Sep 19, 2011, at 6:10 PM, rachel lyra hospodar wrote:

> If someone has been this big of a problem, I would prefer if the model we use to deal with them defaulted towards 'return of problem person allowed only after a meeting where they are discussed and have an advocate present' instead of a default setting where time erases all wounds.
> 
> If someone is accused of making women socially uncomfortable we go all ballistic on them, but if they steal our shit they get a simple time out?  This kind of bullshit behavior is just as alarming to me as Harassing the Womenfolk.  I want us to treat it as a Big Deal, and I don't feel safe with this person returning to the space until the meeting where we discuss the fallout from his actions AND HE MIGHT GET BANNED instead of allowed back in.
> 
> We are not toddlers, and timeouts are good for defusing tense feelings, not solving real problems.
> 
> I will be note taking october 11th, and that date works great for me. Jake?
> 
> I do NOT think jay should return before the meeting about him, regardless of when we have it.
> 
> mediumreality.com
> 
> On Sep 19, 2011 7:43 PM, "Danny O'Brien" <danny at spesh.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Jake <jake at spaz.org> wrote:
> > 
> >> yes I can see why you wouldn't want to be the only one propping up Jay,
> >> because I will ask the notetaker to record exactly who is objecting to
> >> banning Jay, and those people will be asked later why they thought it was
> >> necessary, after he returns for a second helping and takes the rest of the
> >> microscopes.
> >>
> > 
> > In the interest of pointing out the potential compromise positions, I'd say
> > that if this one fails, it's entire possible to propose a second banz0ring
> > session on October 11th.
> > 
> > That would give Jay an opportunity period from the 6th-11th to come in and
> > steal all the microscopes, of course.
> > 
> > So if that period of what I will call "temporary microscopy saturnalia"
> > isn't acceptable, someone can also move to extend Jay's ban (or more
> > technically, insert an involuntary period of bannination between Jay's
> > voluntary one, with goes out of date on the 6th to the 11th) to cope with
> > this contingency.
> > 
> > These two proposals would I think comply with all members' current concerns
> > that I am aware of, and perhaps give time to reconcile the hundred or so
> > more that will surely instantly arise to take their place.
> > 
> > Blocking either proposal would of course be an indication of sour grapes and
> > microscope-hating anarchy (and not the good kind of anarchy, the baad baad
> > kind) and people doing so should be put on a list for all to see.
> > 
> > I'm not going to be here for any of this stuff, being in an *actual* court
> > of law that week, but I'll put it in as a suggestion in tomorrow's notes
> > anyway.[1]
> > 
> > I also, as I mentioned to a few people, I emailed Jay telling him that
> > there's a proposal to ban him, and advising him it's probably sensible for
> > him to stay the hell away from our amazing whirling dervish of an
> > organization for all time.
> > 
> > Al, would you like me to suggest he check out Ace Monster Toys? [2]
> > 
> > Hail Eris!
> > 
> > d.
> > [1] Has anyone actually volunteered to be the note-taker at tomorrow's
> > meeting yet? Oh, noooooooo.
> > [2] I kid! I was going to send him down to Biocurious.
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Rubin Abdi wrote:
> > 
> >> Kelly wrote, On 2011-09-18 23:28:
> >>> Is there
> >>> someone who will be at the meeting next week to block / defer the ban for
> >>> future consideration?
> >>
> >> I know of others out there who feel the same, I would appreciate it I
> >> wasn't the only (vocal) one at this next meeting.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Rubin
> >> rubin at starset.net
> >>
> >>
> > 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> >> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> >> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >>
> >>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20110919/a722cf85/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list