[Noisebridge-discuss] Reorganization at noisebridge

[jim]

    [devil's due] yes, yes, the space is much improved with 
the member shelves against the south wall. 
    as to wanting to twist in the wind, i don't want to, I 
want my stuff back. Yes, I figure there's a good chance that 
I'll eventually find it, but I'll find it faster if those 
who participated in the moving will let me know where to 
look for a plastic storage container labeled j atwell. 
    and unlike rainwater, people may respond to determined 
pleas to be considerate. some people, anyway. 




On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 16:42 -0800, Corey McGuire wrote:
> I know the discussion is about the action, but I am removing that for
> a moment.
> 
> I think people need to take a breath, step back, and consider the
> state.  It's better than "not bad", it's "good".  I would go so far as
> to say that it is an improvement, though that is subjective.
> 
> If people want to twist in the wind over the action, let them.  If
> people would consider the quality of the space, minus the quality of
> people's actions or intents, I will not suggest that they'd feel it
> was an improvement, but I will suggest that it would be a more useful
> discussion than who did what and how.
> 
> As we have stated before in the few theft threads on this list, we
> know the risks of keeping our stuff at a public space.  Consider this
> but one more.
> 
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:20 PM, jim <jim at well.com> wrote:
>         
>         
>             I agree. The discussion seems to be the manner of
>         making the change, yes?
>         
>            As to universes, noisebridge strikes me as a set
>         of universes, some intertwined. there are universes
>         that show up in the evenings, mornings, mid-days,
>         weekends, mostly IRC, mostly mailing lists.... Good
>         to remember these universes exist; noisebridge is not
>         just the people who are here when I'm here.
>         
>         
>         
>         
>         On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 16:08 -0800, Corey McGuire wrote:
>         > I am going to try to say this in the most drama resistant
>         way:
>         >
>         > If 2169 existed in two universes, and in these two
>         universes, it
>         > evolved differently; one where the member shelves were in
>         the state
>         > they used to be in in our universe, and one where the member
>         shelves
>         > were as they are now in our universe, I think just about
>         anyone from
>         > any other universe would prefer the latter 2169 to the
>         former.
>         
>         > _______________________________________________
>         > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>         > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>         >
>         https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>         
>         
>         
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler -
> Albert Einstein
> Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication - Leonardo Da Vinci
> Perfection is reached not when there is nothing left to add, but when
> there is nothing left to take away - Antoine de Saint Exupéry
> Keep It Simple Stupid - Kelly Johnson
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss