[Noisebridge-discuss] "Grant" item from the Tuesday meeting

Rubin Abdi rubin at starset.net
Thu Jun 21 02:35:07 UTC 2012


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Andy Isaacson wrote, On 2012-06-20 19:27:
> Yes, I agree, not having online discussion sucks.
> 
> I think I heard that the reason for not publishing was because we 
> weren't sure if the Foundation was OK with their document being 
> published.  The last I heard was that they are provisionally OK
> with it being published, but that we were going to check to make
> sure before publishing it.
> 
> So hopefully we can have a public discussion of the proposal RSN.

Yes sure, it would also be great if discussion items weren't brought
up that require to be heavily censored in the meeting minutes. Yes,
there, I said it, the C word. If it's not ready for the web it's not
ready for Noisebridge, yo.

Was there some crazy time sensitive thing that needs to happen which
required discussion last night? Unless not I would really appreciate
if no consensus item was drafted up, and discussion continue when less
information has to be blotted out before appearing online.

And no I'm not against getting grants and free money and all that
hoopla, but cripes people let's do this right.


- -- 
Rubin
rubin at starset.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP4ohYAAoJENiO8GEa75D0WYkH+gI8x21RfAuz/A95KspX75vl
qEGykvxBRZqZSW/pkYo84Ul2kiJjZ4JiERIcTKDYDgZcewOGqupzp+hYMR1h9zSi
gkwwcOcCKSDo52cg1EUBKqos8AsAdRP+0xOQwpsSrNPSamEohoUOYcuwwqgqBxDo
AXrwBAOK11NT5tpDqxfGn/lUJRD4qkEa7QjFHaeFarD86CmCi8Rtoek6pZinFSd/
au5KgU1SfVoEhNxlaP75nEpIdGQF9f9xAVG8WmPd5eieriDm3uttdyu+guzW2vTl
phBf8gZ+iIV8KAQPJn8gXgUQ0VM6pBhnXb2rRvS4O6Gztay1o+ZWkIxVmMiamK0=
=EJkC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list