[Noisebridge-discuss] moderating claypool

[Eric W. Rasmussen]

Spam filter?

If this person doesn't get a response from the collective then it will 
drive him into a deep depression, at which point he will evaluate his 
life and possibly see the errors of his ways.

Sometimes the best solutions are to ignore the problem. Spam filters are 
excellent for this type of situation.

Maybe this public correspondence will achieve the desired effect.

Neutral As Always,

ewr

On 06/25/2012 12:49 PM, Jeffrey Carl Faden wrote:
> You should re-read some of his posts and see what he's saying. It's
> obvious that he doesn't mean what he says and is only trying to rile
> people up.
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Eric W. Rasmussen<ewr at majortek.com>  wrote:
>> I haven't noticed any overall negativity from Mr. Claypool, but maybe
>> it's because I know how to filter out the noise. Maybe I haven't placed
>> the name with the face.
>>
>> I don't think it's wise to censor people that you disagree with. I think
>> that if you have a problem with someone then you should address it
>> privately rather than publicly. I think that encouraging people to talk
>> behind his back is hypocritical and immature.
>>
>> There needs to be some diplomacy when dealing with the people that piss
>> you off. Respect is a two way street. Hopefully the respect you give
>> will be noticed and reciprocated. Please keep it civil for the sake of
>> the collective.
>>
>> On 06/25/2012 10:40 AM, Andy Isaacson wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Over the last two months, several of us have asked "Lord Claypool" to
>>> stop being an asshole on the mailing list.  He's generally been an ass
>>> in response to such requests, and has generally continued to be a net
>>> negative list contributor, without any redeeming positive qualities.
>>>
>>> As a result, I'm planning to set his moderate flag.
>>>
>>> Let me know if anybody has an objection to this action.  I'd also like
>>> to hear if you're in favor of this action, but off-list please; there's
>>> no reason to have a huge "me too" thread.
>>>
>>> Also, I'd like to hear how people would like this to be handled in the
>>> future; this post is of course a huge drama magnet which I'd like to
>>> avoid, but I'm uncomfortable with the idea of removing posting
>>> privileges without any public disclosure.  Maybe I should just get over
>>> that hang-up.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -andy
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss