[Noisebridge-discuss] membership rosta
gopiballava at gmail.com
Fri May 18 21:31:05 UTC 2012
You should publish a list of SHA1 hashes of name+salt for any members who want to disclose their names.
gopi at iPhone
On May 18, 2012, at 14:17, "Danny O'Brien" <danny at spesh.com> wrote:
> So, I was thinking of emailing our current list of members, and asking
> if they'd like to be on a *public* list of members, so that people
> could contact them for sponsorship, admire their shiny sleek
> membership coat, etc. Obviously, the public list would be opt-in --
> we've had long standing consensus that the overall membership list is
> private, with various constraints to that as per our byelaws (which
> require me to give you a list of our /bye-lawish/ member list, which
> is not the same as our *real* membership list, due to anarchist
> collective/501(c)3 definitional mismatch.
> I only just thought of this, but before I do this and stoke that
> hornet's nest (I don't think we've really ever mailed the membership
> at large), I thought I'd stoke this hornet's nest first. Do people
> think this would be a good idea? Would you like to know who the
> members are? Is it better that we mostly try to minimise the
> difference between official members and just the community at large?
> Your thoughtful, kindly-worded and generous-to-opposing views opinions
> are passively aggressively welcomed!
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss