[Noisebridge-discuss] New Android app: Noisegate
rachel lyra hospodar
rachelyra at gmail.com
Tue Oct 9 21:03:04 UTC 2012
On 10/9/2012 9:27 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
> An android app already existed; Josh's app is just a stripped-down form
> of the same thing.
True. Josh also asked for feedback and opinions.
>
> In any case, ignoring for a moment the question of a need for increased
> access control, I think the existing Android app was a great thing from
> an accessibility perspective (the pay phone is not very reachable from
> my wheelchair), and Josh's app is potentially a major UI improvement.
>
Thanks for sharing this! It's great use case data. I am not opposed to
a phone solution, just specifically unenthused about certain aspects of
this implementation.
R.
> On Oct 9, 2012 9:01 AM, "rachel lyra hospodar" <rachelyra at gmail.com
> <mailto:rachelyra at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> We do have undesired, even banned users, who have smartphones. I
> personally don't think 'has an android' is a meaningful bar of
> entry. My preference would be a more platform-agnostic tool - for
> example, some kind of sms authentication.
>
> I think it's interesting that, at the same time that jake (with much
> community backing and momentum) is talking about further restricting
> gate access, based on actual identity, josh has created a way for
> anyone to come in without any authentication at all. We already had
> this, sort of, with physical keys. The difference now is that it
> comes with a handy built-in economic and technological barrier, and
> without the meatspace authentication process of having to be given a
> physical key.
>
> Additionally, I have an issue with the ability to easily buzz the
> door remotely. I think access to our physical space should be linked
> to presence at the physical space.
>
> Sounds less than excellent to me.
>
> R.
>
> On Oct 6, 2012 11:30 AM, "Josh Juran" <jjuran at gmail.com
> <mailto:jjuran at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I'm creating an Android app to open the gate.
>
> There is already an Android app that can do this, but I'm
> dissatisfied with it for a number of reasons, and my use case
> really does only call for opening the gate and nothing else.
> Here are my thoughts on the new app:
>
> It's called Noisegate. I'm reusing the Noisebridge app icon
> from the existing Noisebridge app.
>
> The app has a single main screen with a slider control. That
> lets you open the gate with one touch (once the app is open)
> with minimal risk of accidental triggering. There will be at
> least one info screen and some links to the Web as well.
>
> It uses the same Web service on pony as the existing Noisebridge
> app, with the same key of "MobileBridge". I'd especially like
> to know if people think it should use a different key, or
> something more sophisticated than a single hard-coded value.
> Though we should probably punt this as needless complexity
> until we start having an issue with undesired visitors using
> smartphones for entry, which doesn't seem a likely scenario for
> now. On the other hand, buzzing the gate remotely (either from
> malice or mere curiosity) is a potential issue we may want to
> guard against.
>
> I'd like to hear your feedback. Let me know what you'd like to
> see in this app.
>
> Josh
>
>
> _________________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.__noisebridge.net
> <mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
> https://www.noisebridge.net/__mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-__discuss
> <https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> <mailto:Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net>
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
More information about the Noisebridge-discuss
mailing list