[Noisebridge-discuss] access control improvements

[Rachel McConnell]

Mik, yeah, your own criteria.  If someone asks to be let in, and you 
choose to let them in, this means you found them acceptable by whatever 
criteria you think is good.  If you don't think they are appropriate for 
NB, don't let them in.  Someone else may have a different opinion, and 
then the other person may choose to let them in.  This does in fact end 
up as people in the space applying "their own criteria in an arbitrary 
manner".  It's an indication that the system is working.  Excessive 
consistency is an indication that it's not.

Seriously there is *NO* official policy of any kind at NB.  "Be 
Excellent" is the only guideline.  Use your own judgment, consider other 
people's points of view, apply your brain.  Be the kind of person you 
want everyone else to be.  This is not how the world in general works, 
true; but shouldn't it?

Rachel1.0

On 10/9/12 2:37 PM, Clarence Beeks wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Mitchel McAllister
> <xonimmortal at yahoo.com <mailto:xonimmortal at yahoo.com>> wrote:
>
>     'm interested in hearing what the criteria for "acceptable" users is.
>
>
> Unacceptable:  Cretins who steal stuff and ruin it for the rest of us.
>
> Acceptable:  People who don't.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>