[Noisebridge-discuss] misogynist loser visiting noisebridge

[Gregory Dillon]

As a California non-profit corporation the law provides that there are
"rights" to membership that non-members do not have.  One specific
privilege or right is that "E" may ask the chief financial officer  to
inspect the books.  I know that is oversimplified, and doesn't apply in
100% of the cases, but it is a general rule for how members have different
rights than non-members.


On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Danny O'Brien <danny at spesh.com> wrote:

> There are no privileges to membership, apart from blocking (and a
> currently entirely theoretical first dibs on hacker shelves).  Anyone
> can ask anyone to leave. Or at least, that used to be the case.
>
> I'm a bit disturbed that the direction we're taking seem to be taking
> powers *away* from visitors to Noisebridge.
>
> d.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Hannah Grimm <dharlette at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Because the anti-harassment policy predates the associate members
> existence,
> > and I don't know the rules around associate members well.  Did the
> meeting
> > in which we created them give them all the privileges of NB membership
> > EXCEPT the block, or did it specifically just give them the ability to
> be in
> > the space?  If it's the former, then any member would be able to remove
> > them.  This would be nice, since there should (theoretically) always be a
> > member in the space anytime we have people there.
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Danny O'Brien <danny at spesh.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Why does it need a "capital M" member?
> >>
> >> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Hannah Grimm <dharlette at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > "Trolling" is a deceptively benign term.  If anyone sees someone put
> up
> >> > similar fliers again, please grab a capital-M-member and have them ask
> >> > that
> >> > person to leave and never come back.  This behavior is clearly covered
> >> > by
> >> > our anti-harassment policy, and as a result doesn't require consensus
> to
> >> > ban.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Al Sweigart <asweigart at gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> "It's nothing bitch shut up" isn't well-meaning, it's just trolling.
> >> >> Take
> >> >> the flyer down, toss it, and continue hacking. But do message the
> list
> >> >> again
> >> >> if this anonymous coward keeps putting them up.
> >> >>
> >> >> -Al
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:43 PM, johny radio <johnyradio at gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Jake <jake at spaz.org> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> i'm wondering if this person was some well-meaning activist trying
> to
> >> >>>> start a discussion.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> or trying to set a honey trap. Yes, i agree with you Jake.
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> >> >> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> >> >> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> >> > Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> >> > https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
> >> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>



-- 
Let's stay in touch.  Greg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20131223/cb03a248/attachment-0001.html>