[Noisebridge-discuss] door opening credentials - a suggestion for improved access control

[J.C.]

What about Dual Authentication, there's the usual form of authentication
downstairs, key/code/hack/etc, put an additional lock on the upstairs door.
This would address a lot of issues, including that ppl randomly buzzed in
are still greeted at the door by being actually let in.

Security/Control/Access, should be layered, no, risk management 101?


On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:08 AM, Andrew Byrne <andrew at pachakutech.com>wrote:

> Not complaining, but that would require ensuring those already holding
> codes attended the proper classes, so as to ensure statements of fact in
> the test are not later invalidated by Old Heads.
>
> Mike is certainly not a quartermaster; has he renounced the title of
> ombudsman as well? It's a sad day when you can't go to Mike with your
> troubles.
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Danny O'Brien <danny at spesh.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Nicholas Granado <ngranado at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> ah the code pad on the inside is brilliant!
>>>
>>>
>> I like it!
>>
>> Okay, to push this to the point where people *do* complain... what do
>> people think about the idea that getting a code to open the door involves
>> going through some kind of cultural briefing -- like attending a
>> Noisebridge 101 lesson, or doing an online test, or somesuch? Part of the
>> briefing would be making clear that you're responsible for the people you
>> let in, which is something we've always tried to convey to people but never
>> very successfully. Other stuff would be where you find the answer to
>> certain problems, what to do in certain emergencies, how to escort someone
>> out, who likes backrubs and whether mike is an ombudsmen or a quartermaster.
>>
>> This would mean that we'd have a wider circle of just members who are
>> seen as responsible people in the space, but we'd still have *someone*
>>
>> d.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Snail <snailtsunami at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Jake <jake at spaz.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Some anti-camera people said that they would be okay with a camera at
>>>>> the
>>>>> door if there were a physical curtain hanging in front of it unless a
>>>>> rope
>>>>> were pulled by the person waiting outside the door, so that they could
>>>>> make themselves visible to the person inside at the door-open button.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I love this idea!
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> -Snailssnailssnailssnailssnailssnailssnails
>>>> ............. _ at y
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -- --
> -- -- -- --
> -- -- -- -- -- --
> @AndruByrne
> CEO, Pachakutech
> www.pachakutech.com/intro.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/attachments/20130117/7cee916f/attachment-0003.html>