[Noisebridge-discuss] dreamworks reply

[Danny O'Brien]

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 08:50:17PM -0800, Seth David Schoen wrote:
> Danny O'Brien writes:
> 
> > In my original draft I actually had a couple of sentences aimed more at the
> > clearance agency employees (the end of the first para below, and the PS).
> > 
> > In the end, I took them out because really (as I guess the Wikileaks
> > twitter account has already indicated), this is more of an open letter than
> > an actual reply. An actual reply would have just been "No; go ahead." Also
> > I don't think people actually respond that well to people telling them that
> > their jobs are silly.
> 
> Yeah, I guess I was thinking more of sending it explicitly to people
> with a different role in the production (who might be more personally
> interested) rather than spending more time criticizing the clearance
> folks' job.
> 

Agreed.

Well, we can certainly cc: who we want!

d.

> -- 
> Seth David Schoen <schoen at loyalty.org>      |  No haiku patents
>      http://www.loyalty.org/~schoen/        |  means I've no incentive to
>   FD9A6AA28193A9F03D4BF4ADC11B36DC9C7DD150  |        -- Don Marti
>