[Noisebridge-discuss] When were bunk-beds installed?

[Jake]

the problem is that a troll on a troll gets lost in translation.  The bunk 
beds were originally installed as a troll on noisebridge's sleeper 
problem, and now people don't realize it was a terrible joke, so they 
actually believe that noisebridge is a place for people to go to sleep.

what a terrible thing to do to a hackerspace in the mission.

-jake

Eric W. Rasmussen wrote:

I was being sarcastic.

On 07/10/2013 02:13 AM, Robert Picone wrote:
> Isn't part of the point for them to be visible?  As I understand it,
> one of the biggest issues with sleeping at noisebridge was people
> slipping somewhere out of sight to actually use as a bedroom rather
> than a place to drowse off temporarily, knowing they'll be wakened soon.
>
> If someone is snoring particularly noticeably in the stackers and not
> actively hacking as they do so, I don't see any reason why you
> shouldn't wake them and explain that they're making it harder to work,
> and that they should try to avoid sleeping at the space anyway.  You
> should treat it like you'd treat anyone else that was being loud
> without doing any actual hacking.
>
> Only if you actually see wires sticking out of their head, or some
> sort of hacked apnea-abating device plugged into their face should you
> really feel any obligation to actually let them sleep if it's 
disruptive.
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Eric W. Rasmussen <ewr at majortek.com
> <mailto:ewr at majortek.com>> wrote:
>
>     If the beds were in a separate lab room, I wouldn't have a
>     problem. But the beds are in the middle of the space and it forces
>     other members to endure snoring and the such.
>
>     Why don't you substitute the "Photo Lab" for the "Nuerosky Lab"?
>
>